THE PRACTICE OF EFFICIENCY DEFENSE IN ANTITRUST CASES: A COMPARISON OF BRICS AND EUROPEAN CASES
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-3-
Abstract
In non-merger antitrust cases efficiencies should play a significant role when authorities decide on cases as many potentially anticompetitive practices may have pro-competition effects, according to economic theory. In many jurisdictions rule of reason or effect based legal standard is claimed to be the policy adopted according to the own authorities. For such legal standards, considering efficiencies is part of the standard analysis protocol. We review the practice of efficiency defense in antitrust cases in a number of BRICS and European countries. The case study shows that efficiencies are considered in rulings less often than expected. Similar arguments are used across countries, suggesting a common underlying economic analysis across jurisdictions that may have different legal institutions. We also summarize the main reasons for efficiencies analysis not to be able to reverse the concluded anticompetitive effect from a business practice.
Keywords
About the Authors
Eduardo Pontual RibeiroBrazil
Svetlana Golovanova
Russian Federation
References
1. Ahlborn, C., Evans, D.S., Padilla, J. The antitrust economics of tying: a farewell to per se illegality. 49(1-2) Antitrust Bulletin 287-341. (2004). DOI: 10.1177/0003603X0404900108
2. Avdasheva S. B., Golovanova S., Shastitko A. The Contribution of BRICS to the International Competition Policy Regime, in: Global Governance in Transformation Challenges for International Cooperation / Ed. by L.M. Grigoryev, A. Pabst. Springer. 241-259. (2020). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23092-0_15
3. Avdasheva, S., Golovanova, S. Concerted practice enforcement in Russia: How judicial review shapes the standards of evidence and number of enforcement targets. 6(3) Russian Journal of Economics 239-257. (2020). DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.63.51277
4. Bradford, A., Chilton, A., Linos, K., Weaver, A. The Global Dominance of European Competition Law Over American Antitrust Law, 16(4) Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 731-766. (2019). DOI: 10.1111/jels.12239
5. DEE-CADE. Mercado de Saúde Suplementar: condutas [Conducts in the private health sector]. Caderno do CADE Dez/21. (2021) https://cdn.cade.gov.br/Portal/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/estudos-economicos/cadernos-do-cade/Caderno-Saude-Suplementar_Condutas_Atualizado-VFinal.pdf
6. Golovanova, S., Ribeiro, E.P. Testing the convergence of legal standards in antitrust investigations in BRICS (2022), presentation delivered at the CRESSE conference, Crete, Greece, 1 July 2022, available at https://www.cresse.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2022_ps2_pa2_Pontual-Ribeiro.pdf
7. Katsoulacos Y., Makri, G. The Role of Economics and the Type of Legal Standards in Antitrust Enforcement by the EC: An Empirical Investigation. 9(3) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 457–504. (2021). DOI: 10.1093/jaenfo/jnab001
8. Katsoulacos, Y. (2019). On the concepts of legal standards and substantive standards (and how the latter influences the choice of the former). Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 7(3), 365-385. DOI: 10.1093/jaenfo/jnz011
9. Katsoulacos, Y. Legal and substantive standards in competition law enforcement: Relationships and jurisdictional variations. 68(2) Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 7-24. (2020). DOI: 10.5937/AnaliPFB2002007K
10. Katsoulacos, Y., Avdasheva, S., Benetatou, K., Golovanova, S., Makri, G. Comparing the Role of Economics/Effects-Based in Antitrust Enforcement and Its Relation to the Judicial Review in the EC to Other Countries. 12(2) Journal of European Competition law and Practice 122-142. (2021). DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpab003
11. Motta, M. Competition Policy. Cambridge U Press. (1994).
12. O’Donoghue, R., Padilla, J. The Law and Economics of Article 102 TFEU (3nd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing. (2020). DOI: 10.5040/9781509942985
13. OECD Competition Policy and Efficiency Claims in Horizontal Agreements. (1995). https://search.oecd.org/daf/competition/2379526.pdf
14. OECD The Role of Efficiency Claims in Antitrust Proceedings. (2012). https://search.oecd.org/daf/competition/EfficiencyClaims2012.pdf
15. OECD Safe Harbours and Legal Presumptions in Competition Law. (2017). https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD(2017)82/en/pdf
16. Ribeiro E.P., Mattos, C. Hello, Goodbye: The Brazilian Experience with Excessive Pricing Cases in Excessive Pricing and Competition Law Enforcement. / Ed. by Y. Katsoulacos and F. Jenny, Springer. 173-188. (2018). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92831-9_7
Review
For citations:
Pontual Ribeiro E., Golovanova S. THE PRACTICE OF EFFICIENCY DEFENSE IN ANTITRUST CASES: A COMPARISON OF BRICS AND EUROPEAN CASES. BRICS Law Journal. 2023;10(3). https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-3-
Email this article 