Bridging Sovereignty and Sustainability: The Transnational Legal Process in BRICS
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2025-12-4-5-32
Abstract
In an era marked by the increasing importance of aGlobal South agenda to overcome environmental challenges, the BRICS have gained prominence as an influential actor in pursuing sustainable development. This paper investigates how transnational legal mechanisms have become indispensable in propelling sustainability in the BRICS context. It explores the complexities of current environmental legal documents and how the BRICS founding members have addressed them to understand the challenges associated with harnessing legal processes to foster sustainability. By analyzing the interplay between transnational legal frameworks and sustainability agendas, this research contributes valuable insights into the evolving landscape of global governance. It illuminates how BRICS nations navigate legal pathways to address environmental concerns, promote clean energy, and bolster socio-economic development while balancing their domestic legal frameworks. Finally, this paper underscores the significance of transnational legal processes, highlighting the implications for international sustainability efforts in an increasingly interconnected world, particularly in emerging economies.
Supporting agencies: The author would like to thank the AI Global Exchange Forum for its support to the elaboration of this research.
About the Author
R. Thiébaut
AI Global Exchange Forum
United Arab Emirates
United Arab Emirates
Renata Thiébaut – Secretary-General
Compass Building, Al Shohada Rd., AL Hamra Industrial Zone-FZ, Ras Al Khaimah
References
1. Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042001001
2. Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M., & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551271
3. Aburounia, M. H. (2022). Islam and sustainable development (Conference presentation). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364936887_ISLAM_AND_SUSTAINABLE_DEVELOPMENT
4. Barral, V. (2012). Sustainable development in international law: Nature and operation of an evolutive legal norm. European Journal of International Law, 23(2), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chs016
5. Cançado Trindade, A. A. (1994). Environment and development: Formulation and implementation of the right to development as ahuman right. In S.K. Ko, M. C. W. Pinto, & J. J. G. Syatauw (Eds.), Asian yearbook of international law 1993 (Vol. 3, pp. 15–45). Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004400627_005
6. Cullet, P. (1995). Definition of an environmental right in a human rights context. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 13, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934419501300103
7. Decleris, M. (2000). The law of sustainable development: General principles (A report produced for the European Commission). Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. https://www.pik-potsdam.de/avec/peyresq2003/talks/0917/sillence/background_literature/sustlaw.pdf
8. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-commonfuture.pdf
9. Edenhofer, O., et al. (Eds.). (2011). Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139151153
10. Everett, T., Ishwaran, M., Ansaloni, G. P., & Rubin, A. (2010). Economic growth and the environment (Defra Evidence and Analysis Series, Paper 2). GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69195/pb13390-economic-growth-100305.pdf
11. Fuentes, C. I. (2008). Normative plurality in international law: The role of soft law in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1134101
12. Guzman, A. T., & Meyer, T. L. (2010). International soft law. Journal of Legal Analysis, 2(1), 171–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/2.1.171
13. Hathaway, O. A., McElroy, S., & Solow, S. A. (2012). International law at home: Enforcing treaties in U.S. courts. Yale Journal of International Law, 37(1), 52–106.
14. Khorbaladze, E. (2021). BRICS development strategy – priority areas of cooperation for gaining a foothold in a multipolar world order. BRICS Law Journal, 8(4), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-4-4-30.
15. Koh, H. H. (1996). The 1994 Roscoe Pound lecture: Transnational legal process. Nebraska Law Review, 75(1), 181–207.
16. Koh, H. H. (1997). Review essay: Why do nations obey international law? Yale Law Journal, 106(8), 2599–2659. https://doi.org/10.2307/797228
17. Koh, H. H. (2006). Why transnational law matters. Penn State International Law Review, 24(4), 745–753.
18. Menkel-Meadow, C. (2011). Why and how to study “transnational” law. UC Irvine Law Review, 1(1), 97–129.
19. New Development Bank. (2016). Environment and social framework. https://www.ndb.int/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ndb-environment-social-framework20160330.pdf
20. New Development Bank. (2023). Second-party opinion overview of the New Development Bank sustainable financing policy framework. https://www.ndb.int/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/SPO-Sustainlytics.pdf
21. New Development Bank. (2024). NDB’s policy framework. https://www.ndb.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/IEO-CLE-PolicyFramework.pdf
22. Nowrot, K. (1993). New approaches to the international legal personality of multinational corporations towards a rebuttable presumption of normative responsibilities. European Society of International Law. https://esil-sedi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Nowrot.pdf
23. Patrick, S., et al. (2025). BRICS expansion and the future of world order: Perspectives from member states, partners, and aspirants. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2025/03/31/brics-expansion-and-future-ofworld-order-perspectives-from-member-states-partners-and-aspirants-pub-95079
24. Raustiala, K., & Slaughter, A.-M. (2002). International law, international relations, and compliance. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), The handbook of international relations (pp. 538–558). Sage Publications.
25. Rezek, F. (2010). Direito internacional: Curso elementar (12th ed.). Editora Saraiva. (In Portuguese).
26. Rose, G. L. (2011). National and global environmental laws: Dichotomy and interlinkages as examined through the implementation of multilateral environmental agreements. First Preparatory Meeting of the World Congress on Justice, Governance and Law for Environmental Sustainability. United Nations Environment Programme. http://www.unep.org/delc/Portals/24151/NationalandGlobalEnvironmentalLaws.pdf
27. Shelton, D., & Kiss, A. (2005). Judicial handbook on environmental law. United Nations Environment Programme. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/8606/JUDICIAL_HBOOK_ENV_LAW.pdf?sequence=3&%3BisAllowed=
28. Silva, E., & Campos B. (2021). Possible legal cooperation for a BRICS perspective on international and transnational economic law. BRICS Law Journal, 8(4), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-4-31-37
29. Simmons, B. A., & Steinberg, R. H. (Eds.). (2007). International law and international relations: An international organization reader. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808760
30. Souto, M. (2025). BRICS GDP outperforms global average, accounting for 40% of world economy. BRICS Brazil 2025. https://brics.br/en/news/brics-gdp-outperformsglobal-average-accounts-for-40-of-world-economy#:~:text=In%202024%2C%20BRICS%20collectively%20reached,rising%20to%2041%25%20in%202025
31. Vabulas, F. A., & Duncan, S. (2011). Informal Intergovernmental Organizations (IIGOs) (APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper). SSRN. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1903350
32. Vylegzhanin, A., Ivanov, D., & Milyukova, M. (2023). Renewable energy in international law: The Russian perspective for developing a common BRICS approach. BRICS Law Journal, 10(2), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-2-5-36
33. Wilets, J. D. (2014). A unified theory of international law, the state, and the individual: Transnational legal harmonization in the context of economic and legal globalization. Journal of International Law, 31(3), 753–825.
34. Xue, H., & Jin, Q. (2009). International treaties in the Chinese domestic legal system. Chinese Journal of International Law, 8(2), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmp007
35. Zhang, J. (2012). Delivering environmentally sustainable economic growth: The case of China. Asia Society. http://asiasociety.org/files/pdf/Delivering_Environmentally_Sustainable_Economic_Growth_Case_China.pdf
Review
For citations:
Thiébaut R. Bridging Sovereignty and Sustainability: The Transnational Legal Process in BRICS. BRICS Law Journal. 2025;12(4):5-32. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2025-12-4-5-32
Views:
361
Email this article 