IN SEARCH OF A COMPARATIVE METHODOLOGY IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
Abstract
This article examines whether a judicial methodology to the use of comparative law has developed in the jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court. It does so by examining 17 recent cases where the Constitutional Court has considered foreign law. The article finds that a clear legal methodology to the use of foreign law has not developed in the jurisprudence of the Court. Foreign law is often relied on in a piecemeal fashion and these examples are often “cherry picked” with little or no justification provided by the Court. The Court still shows a preference for considering “Global North” experiences. In addition, the Court has mostly failed to consider the social realities and cultural considerations of the comparator countries vis-à-vis those of South Africa.
About the Author
Marthinus Jacobus van StadenSouth Africa
Associate Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Johannesburg
References
1. Möllers T. Legal Methods (1st ed., München: Beck, 2020).
2. Eberle E. The Methodology of Comparative Law, 16 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 51 (2011).
3. Ackermann A. Constitutional Comparativism in South Africa: A Response to Sir Basil Markesinis and Jorg Fedtke, 80 Tul. L. Rev. 169 (2005).
4. Bobek M. Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Courts (1st ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).
5. Tribe L., & Dorf M.C. On Reading the Constitution (1st ed., Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991).
6. Murkens J.E.K. Comparative Constitutional Law in the Courts: Reflections on the Originalists’ Objections, 41 Verfassung und Recht in Übersee 32(2008).
7. Friedman A. Beyond Cherry-Picking: Selection Criteria for the Use of Foreign Law in Domestic Constitutional Jurisprudence, 44 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 873(2011).
8. Legrand P. Jameses at Play: A Tractation on the Comparison of Laws, 65 Am. J. of Comp. L. 1 (2017).
9. Basil Markesinis & Jorg Fedtke, Judicial Recourse to Foreign Law – A New Source of Inspiration? (ist ed., New York: Routledge, 2006).
10. Munshi S. Comparative Law and Decolonizing Critique, 65 Am. J. of Comp. L. 207 (2017).
11. Scaffardi L. BRICS, a Multi-Centre Legal Network, 5 Beijing L. Rev. 140 (2014).
Review
For citations:
van Staden M.J. IN SEARCH OF A COMPARATIVE METHODOLOGY IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT. BRICS Law Journal. 2022;9(3).
Email this article 