Images of Corporeality in Law: The Experience of the BRICS Countries
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-1-58-83
Abstract
This article presents the authors’ approaches to understanding the concept of corporeality in its normative dimension. The purpose of the study is to conceptualize the images of human corporeality that exist in the system of legal regulation. Based on the idea that the research category is a representation of certain characteristics of the human body, the authors substantiate the possibility of using institutional and functional-activity approaches to analyzing human corporeality. Both of these approaches are based on distinct foundations, which include social institutions, fields of activity and functional purposes of the human body. The common basis for the two approaches lies in the biosocial component, which is considered one of the defining characteristics of an image of corporeality. Depending on the approach used, the authors propose three classifications of images of corporeality: private and public, collective and individual and normal and abnormal. Regulatory practices that are aimed at consolidating these images of corporeality are analyzed within the framework of the current legal regulations in the BRICS countries. The authors conclude by noting that corporeality is a biosocial category that serves as the basis for legal subjectivity, while gaps in existing images of corporeality are the basis for its normalization.
Keywords
About the Authors
А. ZorinaRussian Federation
Aleksandra Zorina – Teaching Assistant, Theoretical and Public Law Disciplines Department; Expert, “Bioethics, Biolaw, Biopolitics” Research Сenter, “4Bio” Laboratory, Center for Innovative Design and Applied Research; Postgraduate Student, Theoretical and Public Law Disciplines Department,
Institute of State and Law
38 Lenina St., Tyumen, 625000
I. Yapryntsev
Russian Federation
Ivan Yapryntsev – Head, “4Bio” Laboratory, Center for Innovative Design and Applied Research; Associate Professor, Theoretical and Public Law Disciplines Department, Institute of State and Law
38 Lenina St., Tyumen, 625000
References
1. Fabre G. The Chinese Healthcare Challenge: Comment on ‘Shanghai Rising: Avoidable Mortality as Measured by Avoidable Mortality Since 2000’, 4(3) International Journal of Health Policy and Management 195 (2015). https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.36
2. Nowotny H. & Testa G. Naked Genes: Reinventing the Human in the Molecular Age (2011).
3. Soares F.V. et al. Evaluating the Impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Família: Cash Transfer Programs in Comparative Perspective, 45(2) Latin American Research Review 173 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0023879100009390
4. Vidalis T. The Emergence of Biolaw: The European Experience and the Evolutionary Approach (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02359-0
5. Агамбен Дж. Homo Sacer. Суверенная власть и голая жизнь [Agamben G. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life] (2011).
6. Агамбен Дж. Средства без цели [Agamben G. Means Without Ends] (2015).
7. Канторович Э.Х. Два тела короля. Исследование по средневековой политической теологии [Kantorowicz E.H. Two Bodies of the King: AStudy in Medieval Political Theology] (2nd ed. 2015).
8. Корецкая М.А. Народ как носитель суверенности и границы политической теологии// Социодинамика. 2019. №1. С. 10–19 [Koretskaya M.A. The People as aBearer of Sovereignty and the Boundaries of Political Theology, 1(11) Sociodynamics 10 (2019)].
9. Паравичини Бальяни А. Тело папы [Paravicini-Bagliani A. The Pope’s Body] (2021).
10. Попова О.В. Тело как территория технологий: от социальной инженерии к этике биотехнологического конструирования: монография [Popova O.V. The Body as a Territory of Technology: From Social Engineering to the Ethics of Biotechnological Design: Monograph] (2021).
11. Тхостов А.Ш. Психология телесности [Tkhostov A.Sh. Psychology of Corporeality] (2002).
12. Фуко М. Надзирать и наказывать. Рождение тюрьмы [Foucault M. Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison] (2022).
13. Фуко М. Ненормальные. Курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1974– 1975 учебном году [Foucault M. Abnormal: A Course of Lectures Given at the Collège de France in the 1974−1975] (2005).
Review
For citations:
Zorina А., Yapryntsev I. Images of Corporeality in Law: The Experience of the BRICS Countries. BRICS Law Journal. 2024;11(1):58-83. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-1-58-83