Preview

BRICS Law Journal

Advanced search

COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA

https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-2-71-94

Full Text:

Abstract

The constitutions and courts both in India and in Pakistan have shown their aspirations and fundamental faith in the federal structure but in practice there is a strong centripetal bias in each of their constitutional-political structures. This bias becomes more evident when the constitution sanctions power to the centre to proclaim emergency situations in the provinces on the basis of Constitutional Machinery Failure. Emerging from their colonial roots, the constitutions of India and Pakistan contain an identical provision on Constitutional Machinery Failure Emergency which has been misused and abused regularly and has been the biggest question mark on federal claims of the two States. This unique system of Constitutional Machinery Failure Emergency has also gone through a number of radical changes in India and Pakistan, which often have been influenced by each other. The article specifies the socio-political-constitutional background of Constitutional Machinery Failure resulting in Provincial Emergency, both in India and in Pakistan, their respective use and abuse by the Executive, legislative attempts to amend and control such power, and judicial response, with similarities and differences in respect of justifiability of such Emergency Proclamations.

About the Author

Panch Rishi Dev Sharma
Public University of Lucknow
India
Assistant Professor, Department of Law


References

1. Adeney K.S. Federal Formation and Consociational Stablisation: The Politics of National Identity Articulation and Ethnic Regulation in India and Pakistan, PhD thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) (2003) (May 10, 2017), available at http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/428/.

2. Agamben G. State of Expression (Kelvin Attell (trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).

3. Austin G. The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of the Nation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966).

4. Baxi U. Constitutional Interpretation and State Formative Practices in Pakistan: A Preliminary Exploration in Comparative Constitutional Law: Festschrift in honour of Professor P.K. Tripathi (M.P. Singh (ed.), 2nd ed., Lucknow: Eastern Book Company, 2011).

5. Benton L. Empires of Exception: History, Laws and Problems of Imperial Sovereignty, 6 Quaderni di Relazioni Internazionali (2007).

6. Brohi A.K. Fundamental Law of Pakistan (Karachi: Din Muhammadi Press, 1958).

7. Feldman H. Constitution of Pakistan (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1956).

8. Ferejohn J. & Pasquino P. The Law of Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers, 2(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law (2004).

9. Hussain N. The Jurisprudence of Emergency: Colonialism and the Rule of Law (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003).

10. Jalal A. Democracy and Authoritarianism in South Asia: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (Lahore: Pakistan Sang-e-Meel Publications, 1995).

11. Jalal A. The Struggle for Pakistan: AMuslim Homeland and Global Politics (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014).

12. Jennings I. Constitutional Problems in Pakistan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957).

13. Kostal R.W. A Jurisprudence of Power: Victorian Empire and the Rule of Law (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).

14. Maluka Z.A. The Myth of Constitutionalism in Pakistan (Karachi and New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).

15. McGarry J. & O’Leary B. Introduction: The Macro-Political Regulation of Ethnic Conflict in The Politics of Ethnic Conflict Regulation: Case Studies of Protracted Ethnic Conflicts (J. McGarry & B. O’Leary (eds.), London and New York: Routledge, 1993).

16. Mill J.S. ASystem of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Method of Scientific Investigation. Vol. 1 (9th ed., London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1875).

17. Omar I. Emergency Powers and Courts in India and Pakistan (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2002).

18. Rajagopalan S. State and Notion of South Asia (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001).

19. Schmitt C. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (George Schwab (trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965).

20. Seervai H.M. Constitutional Law of India (4th ed., New Delhi: Universal Publication House, 1991).

21. Shah S.M.H. Federalism in Pakistan: Theory and Practice (Islamabad: Quaid-i-Azam University, 1994).

22. Sharma J.P. Federal Systems in India and Pakistan: AComparative Perspective (Jaipur: Printwell, 1987).

23. Shiva Rao B. The Framing of Indian Constitution: AStudy (New Delhi: Indian Institute of Administration, 1968).

24. Sorabjee S.J. Decision of the Supreme Court in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India: A Critique, (1994) 3 SCC (Jour) 1.

25. Talbot I. Inventing the Nation: India and Pakistan (London: Hodder Arnold, 2000).

26. Vile M.J.C. Federalism and Confederation: The Experience of the United States and the British Commonwealth in Political Cooperation in Divided Societies (P. Rea (ed.), Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1982).

27. Waseem M. Federalism in Pakistan (August 2010) (May 10, 2017), available at http://www.forumfed.org/pubs/Waseem-Fed-Overview.pdf.

28. Watts R.L. Contemporary Views on Federalism in Evaluating Federal Systems (B. De Villiers (ed.), Cape Town: Juta, 1994).

29. Watts R.L. Federalism, Federal Political Systems and Federations, 1(1) Annual Review of Political Science (1998).

30. Wheare K.C. Federal Government (4th ed., London: Oxford University Press, 1963).


For citation:


Dev Sharma P. COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA. BRICS Law Journal. 2017;4(2):71-94. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-2-71-94

Views: 1964


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2409-9058 (Print)
ISSN 2412-2343 (Online)