Preview

BRICS Law Journal

Advanced search

Role of the Judiciary in the Protection of the Environment in India

https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2026-13-1-156-177

Abstract

It is a well-established principle that the Indian Constitution protects not only the functioning of the country but also the environment for the welfare of its people who live there. The right to live in a clean, healthy environment is one of the most important and basic rights of every citizen. Increased pollution, a lack of plants and animals, and a high awareness of harmful chemicals in the air are all indicators that environmental problems are getting worse. Even though the Constitution does not explicitly enumerate this right, protecting the environment and preventing accidents that hurt the environment are recognized as rights through judicial interpretation. In many cases, big corporations are to blame for the worsening of environmental degradation; however, courts are often reluctant to punish such powerful companies. In the last few decades, the court system has evolved to help regular people obtain justice. This article discusses several landmark environmental decisions from the past and present to gain a better understanding of corporate social responsibility towards society and to evaluate the effectiveness of the Indian courts over the years. This study further situates Indian environmental jurisprudence within a broader BRICS framework by briefly comparing judicial approaches to environmental protection in countries such as China, Brazil, South Africa, and Russia and other countries that have recently joined the alliance, thereby strengthening the international and comparative dimension of the analysis.

About the Authors

M. K. Ganesh
Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr Sagunthala R & D Institute of Science and Technology
India

Manoj Kumar Ganesh – Research Scholar, Assistant Professor, School of Law

No. 42, Vel Tech Road, Vel Nagar, Avadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600062, India



. Sarojanamma
Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr Sagunthala R & D Institute of Science and Technology
Russian Federation

Dr Sarojanamma – Professor of Law, School of Law

No. 42, Vel Tech Road, Vel Nagar, Avadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600062, India



References

1. Aggarwal, S. (2014). 2% CSR clause: Corporate social responsibility or corporate social duty? Company Law Journal, 4(10), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v4-i10/1243

2. Athreya, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility for industry growth. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3), 347–354.

3. Balakrishnan, S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: The new mantra for corporates. Company Cases: The Corporate Law Weekly, 181, 43.

4. Baxi, C. V., & Sinha Ray, R. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: A study of CSR practices in Indian industry. Vikas.

5. Bhal, K. T. (2002). Construct of corporate social responsibility. Management and Change, 6(1), 37–40.

6. Cragg, B. T. (2010). Home is where the halt is: Mandating corporate social responsibility through home state regulations and social disclosure. Emory International Law Review, 24, 736–775.

7. Daryanti, D., & Sudarwanto, A. S. (2024). Legal implications for the BRICS countries in the carbon trading system through carbon exchanges: Perspective from the precautionary principle. BRICS Law Journal, 11(4), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-4-126-144

8. Dube, R., Sengar, D. S., & Ahmed, S. (2012). National Green Tribunal: A new dimension to environmental adjudication in India. ISIL Newsletter, April–June 2012.

9. Idowu, S. O., & Leal Filho, W. (2009). Global practices of corporate social responsibility. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68815-0

10. Jain, A. (2014). The mandatory CSR in India: A boon or bane. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 4(1), 301–304.

11. Khatri, P. V., Kadyan, J. S., & Rashimi. (2013). Corporate governance and social responsibility. Global Vision.

12. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. John Wiley & Sons.

13. Kumar, M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: Contemporary issues in India. Adhayan.

14. Kumar, S., & Ghosh, S. K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: A handbook (Law relating to CSR with practices followed by leading corporate houses). GAIL (India) Limited.

15. Kvanina, V., Kovalenko, E., & Vypkhanova, G. (2023). Improving the legislation on public-private partnerships in environmental protection in the BRICS countries. BRICS Law Journal, 10(3), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-3-106-121

16. Reddy, S. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Concepts and cases (Vol. 1). ICFAI Press.

17. Sahoo, C. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: Issues and controversies. Journal of Business and Management, 3(2), 45–49.

18. Sivaranjini, P., Rekha, T., & Nisha, T. S. (2015). Issues and challenges faced by corporate social responsibility in community development in India. Indian Human Resource Development, 17(7), 58–63.

19. Tricker, B. (2013). Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

20. Upadhyaya, R. B. (1976). Social responsibility of business and the trusteeship theory of Mahatma Gandhi. Sterling.

21. Vertigans, S., & Idowu, S. O. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: Academic insights. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35083-7

22. Vylegzhanin, A., Ivanov, D., & Milyukova, M. (2023). Renewable energy in international law: The Russian perspective for developing a common BRICS approach. BRICS Law Journal, 10(2), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-2-5-36


Review

For citations:


Ganesh M.K., Sarojanamma  Role of the Judiciary in the Protection of the Environment in India. BRICS Law Journal. 2026;13(1):156-177. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2026-13-1-156-177

Views: 93

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2409-9058 (Print)
ISSN 2412-2343 (Online)