COUNTERMAJORITARIAN INSTITUTIONS IN THE RUSSIAN CONSTITUTION OF 1993 AS AN INSTRUMENT ENSURING CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL STABILITY
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2017-5-1-78-92
Abstract
The article enriches the discussion on the legal reasons and conditions fostering the viability of democratic constitutions by analyzing the rich experience of the Russian Constitution of 1993. Particular attention is paid to the concept of countermajoritarian institutions. The authors elaborate the idea that countermajoritarian institutions can play an important role in ensuring the viability (put in other terms, the proper balance between stability, adaptability, and dynamic development) of modern democratic constitutions as well as political regimes.
The article presents evidence-based data showing that the President and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation systematically acted as countermajoritarian institutions at the initial stage of the implementation of the “blueprint for the future” set down in the 1993 Russian Constitution. As a result of the activities of these institutions, strong legal frameworks were created that are necessary for the establishment of anew constitutional system of the Russian state and law.
Today, the Russian Constitution of 1993 is one of the longest lasting democratic constitutions in the world (the average “life expectancy” of democratic constitutions adopted over the past 250 years is about seventeen years). The study of the countermajoritarian provisions in the 1993 Russian Constitution is of both theoretical and practical importance. In particular, the results of the study can be useful in creating efficient legal instruments for the maintenance of political stability and social development management both within sovereign states and within interstate communities.
About the Authors
S. Shakhray
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vice-Rector, Professor
1 Leninskie Gory, GSP-1, Moscow, 119991
S. Popova
Institute of Socio-Political Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Leading Researcher
6/1 Fotievoy St., Moscow, 119333
References
1. Alberts S. et al. Democratization and Countermajoritarian Institutions Power and Constitutional Design in Self-Enforcing Democracy in Comparative Constitutional Design (T. Ginsburg (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).
2. Bickel A.M. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (2nd ed., New Heaven and London: Yale University Press, 1986).
3. Diamond L. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999).
4. Elkins Z. et al. The Endurance of National Constitutions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
5. Linz J.J. & Stepan A. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).
6. Mittal S. & Weingast B.R. Self-Enforcing Constitutions: With an Application to Democratic Stability in America’s First Century, 29(2) Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 278 (2013).
7. Przeworski A. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
8. Weingast B.R. Capitalism, Democracy, and Countermajoritarian Institutions, 23(1) Supreme Court Economic Review 255 (2015).
9. Weingast B.R. The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law, 91(2) American Political Science Review 245 (1997).
Review
For citations:
Shakhray S., Popova S. COUNTERMAJORITARIAN INSTITUTIONS IN THE RUSSIAN CONSTITUTION OF 1993 AS AN INSTRUMENT ENSURING CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL STABILITY. BRICS Law Journal. 2018;5(1):78-92. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2017-5-1-78-92
Views:
1657
Email this article 