Who Does International Law Serve?
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-3-149-158
Abstract
International law is an effective tool for preventing and resolving conflicts between countries, as well as for facilitating their efficient cooperation in the fields of security, trade, and the protection of human rights. With the emergence of interstate bodies that accept appeals from citizens who disagree with the way their interests were protected within the state, the scope of international law has expanded to include not only the states and their peoples (which is why this law is called “international”) but also individuals who can now be considered subjects of international law. However, in recent years, the authority of international law has seriously weakened. The reasons for this are the selective attitudes toward the fulfillment of obligations assumed by individual governments,“double standards” in the application of generally recognized norms and principles to different states, and outright pressure exerted on interstate bodies by countries claiming global hegemony. The authors prove that international law can well regain its former trust and effectively serve its purposes of promoting peace, universal security, and justice. They support their claim by providing examples of such interstate associations as BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and the Eurasian Economic Union, which are based on and successfully operate on the principles of multipolarity, equality, and mutual respect. The article highlights the efforts made by the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China aimed at the strict observance of the principles of state sovereignty, human rights, and freedoms, including the right to speak one’s native language, as well as the principles of equality and justice in resolving disputes that arise in international relations.
About the Authors
M. MateykovichRussian Federation
Maxim Mateykovich – Chairman, Judiciary, Second Cassation Court of General Jurisdiction, Professor
10 Semakova St., Tyumen, 525003
A. Skorobogatko
Russian Federation
Alexander Skorobogatko – Assistant to the Chief Judge, Second Cassation Court of General Jurisdiction, PhD Student, Department of Criminal Law
9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya St., Moscow, 125993
References
1. Aristodemou M. A Constant Craving for Fresh Brains and a Taste for Decaffeinated Neighbours, 25(1) European Journal of International Law 35 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht080
2. Boon K.E. & Mégret F. New Approaches to the Accountability of International Organizations, 16(1) International Organizations Law Review 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-01601001
3. Janis M.W. Individuals as Subjects of International Law, 17(61) Cornell International Law Journal 61 (1984). http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1101693
4. Kelly J.B. National Minorities in International Law, 3(25) Denver Journal of Law and Policy 253 (1973).
5. Klabbers J. The Cheshire Cat That Is International Law, 31(1) European Journal of International Law 269 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa018
6. Koh H.H. Why Do Nations Obey International Law?, 106(8) Yale Law Journal 2599 (1997).
7. Russell R.B. The Evolution of International Organizations, 61(4) American Political Science Review 1185 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400224829
8. Salako S.E. The Individual in International Law: “Object” versus “Subject”, 8(1) International Law Research 132 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v8n1p132
9. Shaw M.N. International Law (9th ed. 2021).
Review
For citations:
Mateykovich M., Skorobogatko A. Who Does International Law Serve? BRICS Law Journal. 2024;11(3):149-158. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-3-149-158