Legal Support of Artificial Intelligence in Countering Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Regimes in the BRICS Plus Countries
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-3-92-116
Abstract
The increasing integration of artificial intelligence technologies into the financial structures of the BRICS Plus countries (comprising the original member countries of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa as well as the four new member countries of Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates) presents both opportunities and challenges in combating economic crimes, which include money laundering and terrorism financing. This article explores the complex regulatory landscape that governs the application of artificial intelligence in these efforts. It examines how artificial intelligence can enhance the performance of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing frameworks by enabling the evaluation of massive datasets, the identification of anomalous transaction patterns, and the automation of compliance procedures. Simultaneously, the article addresses the highly challenging situations that arise when using artificial intelligence. For instance, these technologies can make it difficult to understand the fluctuation of illicit price ranges, thereby complicating efforts to determine their origins and destinations. Through a comparative analysis of the frameworks throughout the BRICS Plus countries, this research highlights the varying levels of regulatory readiness of these frameworks and proposes pathways for harmonizing artificial intelligence-driven economic security measures. The overarching goal of an artificial intelligence model is to enhance both the effectiveness and the integrity of the financial sectors in the BRICS Plus consortium, necessitating a collaborative approach to combating financial crimes in an increasing number of digital economies across the world.
About the Author
M. Aksenova
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina Aksenova – Senior Lecturer, Department of Financial Monitoring
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198
References
1. Abate A. Implementation of Accounting Information Systems in Ethiopia: Evidence from Small and Medium Enterprises in Bahir Dar City, 6(6) Science Journal of Business Management 107 (2019). https://doi.org/10.11648/J.SJBM.20180606.12
2. Alhosani W. Financial Intelligence Units in the UK and UAE to Date, in Anti-Money Laundering: A Comparative and Critical Analysis of the UK and UAE’s Financial Intelligence Units 17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59455-6_2
3. Ashfaq M. & Ayub U. Knowledge, Attitude, and Perceptions of Financial Industry Employees Towards AI in the GCC Region, in Artificial Intelligence in the Gulf 95 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0771-4_6
4. Barocas S. & Selbst A.D. Big Data’s Disparate Impact, 104 California Law Review 671 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2477899
5. Binns R. Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy, in Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 149 (2018).
6. Brynjolfsson E. & McAfee A. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (2014).
7. Buolamwini J. & Gebru T. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification, in Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 77 (2018).
8. Gebremichael G.G. Efficiency and Productivity of Microfinance Institutions of Ethiopia: A Case Study on Specialized Financial and Promotional Institution (SFPI), 32 Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development 83 (2017).
9. Gless S. et al. If Robots Cause Harm, Who Is to Blame? Self-Driving Cars and Criminal Liability, 19(3) New Criminal Law Review 412 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2016.19.3.412
10. Kubota L.C. & Rosa M.B. Artificial Intelligence in Brazil: Adoption, Scientific Production, and Regulation (2024). https://doi.org/10.38116/tndiset125-eng
11. Meskys E. et al. Regulating Deep Fakes: Legal and Ethical Considerations, 15(1) Journal of Intellectual Property, Law & Practice 24 (2020). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz167
12. Mohamed H. I-FinTech and its Value Proposition for Islamic Asset and Wealth Management, in Billah M.M. (ed.), Islamic FinTech: Insights and Solutions 249 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45827-0_14
13. Sharma M. A Study: How Artificial Intelligence Is Incorporated in the Middle East Banking, 2(3) Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology 202 (2023). https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.2.3.27
14. Voigt P. & von dem Bussche A. The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Practical Guide (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7
15. Winston P.H. & Brown R.H. (eds.). Artificial Intelligence: An MIT Perspective (1980).
16. Yuvaraj S. & Assefa K.B. Evaluating the Design of Accounting Information System and its Implementation in Ethiopian Manufacturing Industries, 2(7) TIJ’s Research Journal of Science & IT Management 16 (2013).
Review
For citations:
Aksenova M. Legal Support of Artificial Intelligence in Countering Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Regimes in the BRICS Plus Countries. BRICS Law Journal. 2024;11(3):92-116. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-3-92-116
Views:
391
Email this article 