Preview

BRICS Law Journal

Advanced search

A Comparative Study of Domestic Violence in BRICS Nations – Pre and Post COVID-19

https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-4-68-97

Abstract

The most common kind of sexual or physical abuse suffered by women is that by a partner. Human rights are violated when males or boys use violence against women or girls. When it comes to domestic abuse, it is estimated that one in three women will experience some kind of gender-based violence at some point in their lives. The number of women who have been abused by a romantic partner or a non-relationship sexual partner is estimated to reach 736 million. For years, the world’s leaders have recognised its seriousness. In 1995, the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action said that violence against women must be eliminated. Within the “UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” a worldwide goal to abolish “all kinds of violence against women and girls in public and private spaces” was added. Global action was called for in 2016 by the “World Health Assembly’s” Resolution 69.5, which urged a national multisector approach to combating violence against women and young girls. In spite of all of these responsibilities, 49 countries still don’t have a clear policy on domestic abuse. Lower and lower-middle-income women nations are particularly vulnerable to this violence, which has long-term effects on their health and well-being. In the world’s poorest nations, women aged 15 to 49 have a lifetime frequency of domestic abuse of 37 percent. One in every four women who have ever been in a relationship has been a victim of domestic abuse at some point in their lives.

About the Authors

M. Singh
CHRIST (Deemed to be) University
India

Manika Singh – Research Scholar, School of Law, CHRIST (Deemed to be) University & Assistant Professor, University Institute of Legal Studies, Chandigarh University

Mariam Nagar, Meerut Rd., Delhi-NCR, Ghaziabad, 201003, Uttar Pradesh 



M. Mathew
CHRIST (Deemed to be) University
India

Meera Mathew – Associate Professor, School of Law

 Mariam Nagar, Meerut Rd., Delhi-NCR, Ghaziabad, 201003, Uttar Pradesh 



References

1. Andreeva A. et al. Women’s Rights and the Feminists’ “Dirty Plans”: Media Discourses During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Russia, 36(3) Affilia 319 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109920960826

2. Bhattacharya R. (ed.). Behind Closed Doors – Domestic Violence in India (2004).

3. Bradbury-Jones C. & Isham L. The Pandemic Paradox: The Consequences of COVID- 19 on Domestic Violence, 29(13-14) Journal of Clinical Nursing 2047 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15296

4. Campbell A.M. An Increasing Risk of Family Violence during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Strengthening Community Collaborations to Save Lives, 2 Forensic Science International: Reports (Article 100089) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100089

5. Deb A. Battered Woman Syndrome: Prospect of Situating It Within Criminal Law in India, 8(4) BRICS Law Journal 103 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-4-103-135

6. Nelaeva G. Violence Against Women in Russia and Brazil: International and Domestic Responses, 8(4) BRICS Law Journal 76 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-4-76-102

7. O’Neill J. Building Better Global Economic BRICs (2001).

8. O’Neill J. Dreaming with BRICS: The path to 2050 (2003).

9. Prandini Assis M. Violence Against Women as a Translocal Category in the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 8(2) Revista Direito e Práxis 1507 (2017). https://doi.org/10.12957/dep.2017.28032

10. Roure J.G. Domestic Violence in Brazil: Examining Obstacles and Approaches to Promote Legislative Reform, 41(1) Columbia Human Rights Law Review 67 (2009).

11. Salomón M. Exploring Brazilian Foreign Policy Towards Women: Dimensions, Outcomes, Actors and Influences, 63(1) Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202000101

12. Sarkar L. Constitutional Guarantees, in Khullar M. (ed.), Writing the Women’s Movement – A Reader 102 (2005).

13. Saunders K. Feminist Post-Development Thought (2004).

14. Sawmya R. Legal Constructions of Domestic Violence, 55(3) Sociological Bulletin 427 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920060305

15. Soares de Lima M. & Hirst M. Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice, and Responsibilities, 82(1) International Affairs 21 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00513.x

16. Stolte C. Brazil in Africa: Seeking International Status, Not Resources, 34(4) Harvard International Review 63 (2013).

17. Stuenkel O. The BRICS and the Future of Global Order (2015).

18. Vom Hau M. et al. Beyond the BRICs: Alternative Strategies of Influence in the Global Politics of Development, 24(2) European Journal of Development Research 187 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57449-7_9


Review

For citations:


Singh M., Mathew M. A Comparative Study of Domestic Violence in BRICS Nations – Pre and Post COVID-19. BRICS Law Journal. 2023;10(4):68-97. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-4-68-97

Views: 1243


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2409-9058 (Print)
ISSN 2412-2343 (Online)