BRICS Law Journal

Advanced search


Full Text:


In order to give effect to the UNICITRAL Model Law on Arbitration and due to radical change in its economy as the result of the 1991 New Economic Policy (NEP) India enacted the 1996 Arbitration & Conciliation Act. This Act provides a pragmatic legal basis for resolution of commercial disputes outside the court procedures. It circumscribes the older laws and consolidates multiple legal norms dealing with arbitration. However, the experiences in application of this Act for the last 20 years suggest that it needs to be amended as it contains serious drawbacks primarily due to poor legal technique which necessitated excessive judicial interventions and judicial overreach having led to resentment among those willing to resort to alternative dispute resolution under this Act while keeping the seat of Arbitration in India. Several attempts were made by the successive governments aiming at amending the 1996 Act. Yet all those attempts failed. Finally the present Union Government under the leadership of the Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi was able to bring in sweeping changes in existing arbitration law. These changes were carried out with the commitment of the Government in doing business in India through the Ordinance route and proper legislative procedures which finally led to the amendments having come into force on January 1, 2016. This paper attempts to analyse the key changes brought through the 2015 Amendment Act and their impact on the application of arbitration law in India. Moreover, the authors overview the prospects of India to acquire the preferred position in International Commercial Arbitration in the future as envisioned by the present Modi Government.

About the Authors

R. Moonka
Institute of Law, Nirma University

Assistant Professor of Law, Head of the Centre for ADR, 

SG Highway, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382481

S. Mukherjee
Institute of Law, Nirma University

Assistant Professor of Law, 

SG Highway, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382481


1. Ahuja S. Arbitration Involving India: Recent Developments, 18(3) Asian Dispute Review (2016).

2. Canfield J. Growing Pains and Coming-of-Age: The State of International Arbitration in India, 14(3) Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (2014).

3. Kachwaha S. The Indian Arbitration Law: Towards a New Jurisprudence, 10 International Arbitration Law Review (2007).

4. Malhotra O.P. The Law and Practice of Arbitration and Conciliation (6th ed., Nagpur: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2013).

5. Mistelis L.A. Seat of Arbitration and Indian Arbitration Law, 4(2) Indian Journal of Arbitration Law (2015).

6. Patkar A. Indian Arbitration Law: Legislating for Utopia, 4(2) Indian Journal of Arbitration Law (2015).

7. Rebello A.P. Of Impossible Dreams and Recurring Nightmares: The Set Aside of Foreign Awards in India, 6(1) Cambridge Student Law Review (2010).

8. Rendeiro A.C. Indian Arbitration and Public Policy, 89 Texas Law Review (2011).

9. Srinivasan B. Arbitration and the Supreme Court: A Tale of Discordance Between the Text and Judicial Determination, 4 National University of Juridical Science Law Review (2011).

10. Sutton D.S.J. et al. Russell on Arbitration (23rd ed., London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007).


For citations:

Moonka R., Mukherjee S. IMPACT OF THE RECENT REFORMS ON INDIAN ARBITRATION LAW. BRICS Law Journal. 2017;4(1):58-71.

Views: 2164

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2409-9058 (Print)
ISSN 2412-2343 (Online)