In Search of a Comparative Methodology in the Jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2022-9-3-84-116
Abstract
This article examines whether a judicial methodology to the use of comparative law has developed in the jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court. It does so by examining 10 recent cases where the Constitutional Court has considered foreign law. The author finds that a clear legal methodology to the use of foreign law has not developed in the jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court. Foreign law is often relied on in a piecemeal fashion and these examples are often “cherry picked” with little or no justification provided by the Court. The Court still shows apreference for considering “Global North” experiences. In addition, the Court has mostly failed to consider the social realities and cultural considerations of the comparator countries vis-à-vis those of South Africa.
About the Author
M. Staden
University of the Witwatersrand
South Africa
South Africa
Marius van Staden – Associate Professor, School of Law, (1 Jan Smuts Ave., Braamfontein
Johannesburg, 2000
References
1. Ackermann L.W.H. Constitutional Comparativism in South Africa: A Response to Sir Basil Markesinis and Jorg Fedtke, 80(1) Tul. L. Rev. 169 (2005).
2. Bobek M. Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Courts (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680382.001.0001
3. Eberle E.J. The Methodology of Comparative Law, 16(1) Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 51 (2011).
4. Friedman A. Beyond Cherry-Picking: Selection Criteria for the Use of Foreign Law in Domestic Constitutional Jurisprudence, 44(4) Suffolk U. L. Rev. 873 (2011).
5. Legrand P. Jameses at Play: A Tractation on the Comparison of Laws, 65(suppl_1) Am. J. Comp. L. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avx018
6. Markesinis B. & Fedtke J. Judicial Recourse to Foreign Law – A New Source of Inspiration? (2006).
7. Möllers T.M.J. Legal Methods (2020). https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406779305
8. Munshi S. Comparative Law and Decolonizing Critique, 65(suppl_1) Am. J. Comp. L. 207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avx019
9. Murkens J.E.K. Comparative Constitutional Law in the Courts: Reflections on the Originalists’ Objections, 41(1) Verfassung und Recht in Übersee 32 (2008). https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2008-1-32
10. Scaffardi L. BRICS, a Multi-Centre Legal Network, 5(2) Beijing L. Rev. 140 (2014).
11. Tribe L.H. & Dorf M.C. On Reading the Constitution (1991). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv26071p5
Review
For citations:
Staden M. In Search of a Comparative Methodology in the Jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court. BRICS Law Journal. 2022;9(3):84-116. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2022-9-3-84-116
Views:
940
Email this article 