Renewable Energy in Russia: System Analysis of Barriers
Abstract
Considering the current ecological situation in the modern world, the quality of life depends not so much on a stable energy supply as on an environmentally friendly way of producing and consuming energy, which has turned social and research attention to the opportunities of renewable energy systems (RES). In spite of the vital necessity of transitioning to environmentally friendly energy production, the implementation and development of renewable energy technologies face a range of barriers: socio-cultural, technological, economic, institutional and environmental. To overcome these barriers, the authors of this article use the systems approach to gain deeper understanding of RES interconnection and interdependence. They apply STEEP analysis for classification and qualitative analysis of RES development barriers in Russia. The article proposes the analytical methodology, which reveals system specifications of the national RES development barriers and predicts the chain reaction of overcoming particular barriers. Using this methodology, the authors identify the main socio-cultural roots of RES development barriers in Russia: state control of the development of the energy sector, the political stake in hydrocarbons and the lack of consistent policies on RES development. The authors’ suggested analysis methodology is appropriate for identifying the root problems in energy socio-economic systems and for effective decision-making process in the energy sector.
About the Authors
A. Ljovkina
Financial-Economic Institute, Tyumen State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasia Ljovkina - Professor, Department of Economic Security, System Analysis and Control
6 Volodarskogo St., Tyumen, 625003
M. Brody
American University
United States
United States
Michael Brody - Adjunct Professor, Department of Environmental Science, and Senior Research Fellow, Center for Environmental Policy
4400 Massachusetts Av., NW Washington, D.C., 20016
E. Karagulyan
Financial-Economic Institute, Tyumen State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Egine Karagulyan - Associate Professor, Department of Economic and Finance
6 Volodarskogo St., Tyumen, 625003
A Zakharova
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga Zakharova - Associate Professor, Department of State and Municipal Administration, State and Law Institute
6 Volodarskogo St., Tyumen, 625003
V. Ljovkin
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vadim Ljovkin - Associate Professor, Department of General and Social Psychology, Psychology and Pedagogy Institute
6 Volodarskogo St., Tyumen, 625003
References
1. Abrardi L. Behavioral Barriers and the Energy Efficiency Gap: A Survey of the Literature, 46(1) Economia e Politica Industriale 25 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-018-0107-z
2. Adams P.W. et al. Barriers to and Drivers for UK Bioenergy Development, 15(2) Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 1217 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.039
3. Alcázar-Ortega M. et al. Methodology for the Identification, Evaluation and Prioritization of Market Handicaps Which Prevent the Implementation of Demand Response: Application to European Electricity Markets, 86 Energy Pol’y 529 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.006
4. Anatolitis V. & Welisch M. Putting Renewable Energy Auctions into Action – An Agent- Based Model of Onshore Wind Power Auctions in Germany, 110 Energy Pol’y 394 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.024
5. Banal-Estañol A. et al., How to Achieve Full Electrification: Lessons from Latin America, 108 Energy Pol’y 55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.036
6. Beck F. & Martinot E. Renewable Energy Policies and Barriers in Encyclopedia of Energy 365 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-176480-x/00488-5
7. Bhattacharya M. et al. The Effect of Renewable Energy Consumption on Economic Growth: Evidence from Top 38 Countries, 162 Appl. Energy 733 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.104
8. Biresselioglu M.E. et al. Examining the Barriers and Motivators Affecting European Decision-Makers in the Development of Smart and Green Energy Technologies, 198 J. Clean. Prod. 417 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.308
9. Blechinger P. et al. Barriers and Solutions to the Development of Renewable Energy Technologies in the Caribbean in Decentralized Solutions for Developing Economies 267 (Sebastian Groh et al., 2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15964-5_24
10. Byrka K. et al. Difficulty Is Critical: The Importance of Social Factors in Modeling Diffusion of Green Products and Practices, 62 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 723 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.063
11. Cointe B. & Nadaï A. Turbulence and Reforms in European Renewable Energy Policy After 2008 in Cointe B. & Nadaï A. Feed-in Tariffs in the European Union: Renewable Energy Policy, The Internal Electricity Market and Economic Expertise 87 (2018). https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76321-7_5
12. Cointe B. From a Promise to a Problem: The Political Economy of Solar Photovoltaics in France, 8 Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.009
13. Curry C. et al. The Potential and Reality of the Solar Water Heater Programme in South African Townships: Lessons from the City of Tshwane, 106 Energy Pol’y 75 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.028
14. Curtis J. et al. Heating System Upgrades: The Role of Knowledge, Socio-Demographics, Building Attributes and Energy Infrastructure, 120 Energy Pol’y 183 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.036
15. Dreidy M. et al. Inertia Response and Frequency Control Techniques for Renewable Energy Sources: A Review, 69 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 144 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.170
16. Ellabban O. et al. Renewable Energy Resources: Current Status, Future Prospects and Their Enabling Technology, 39 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 748 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.113
17. Freitas S. et al. Modelling Solar Potential in the Urban Environment: State-of-the-Art Review, 41 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 915 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.060
18. Gibson L. et al. How Green Is ‘Green’ Energy?, 32(12) Trends Ecol. Evol. 922 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.09.007
19. Golub A. et al. Quantifying Barriers to Decarbonization of the Russian Economy: Real Options Analysis of Investment Risks in Low-Carbon Technologies, 19 Clim. Pol’y 716 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1570064
20. Gulagi A. et al. Electricity System Based on 100% Renewable Energy for India and SAARC, 12(7) PLOS ONE e0180611 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180611
21. Guo X. et al. Willingness to Pay for Renewable Electricity: A Contingent Valuation Study in Beijing, China, 68 Energy Pol’y 340 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.032
22. He L. et al. Green Credit, Renewable Energy Investment and Green Economy Development: Empirical Analysis Based on 150 Listed Companies of China, 208 J. Clean. Prod. 363 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.119
23. Hecher M. et al. The Trigger Matters: The Decision-Making Process for Heating Systems in the Residential Building Sector, 102 Energy Pol’y 288 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.004
24. Huber B.R. Paying for Energy in Energy Law and Economics (Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship, 5) 137 (Klaus Mathis & Bruce R. Huber eds., 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74636-4_7
25. Hwang J.-Y. et al. Sodium-Ion Batteries: Present and Future, 46(12) Chem. Soc. Rev. 3529 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cs00776g
26. Jarach M. An Overview of the Literature on Barriers to the Diffusion of Renewable Energy Sources in Agriculture, 32(2) Appl. Energy 117 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-2619(89)90073-1
27. Kalimo H. et al. Market Definition as Value Reconciliation: The Case of Renewable Energy Promotion under the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, 17(3) Int. Environ. Agreements 427 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-017-9361-1
28. Kim E.-S. & Chung J.-B. The Memory of Place Disruption, Senses, And Local Opposition to Korean Wind Farms, 131 Energy Pol’y 43 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.011
29. Lin K.-C. & Purra M.M. Transforming China’s Electricity Sector: Politics of Institutional Change and Regulation, 124 Energy Pol’y 401 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.041
30. Lorenzoni I. et al. Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change Among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications, 17(3-4) Glob. Envtl. Change 445 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
31. Luthra S. et al. Barriers to Renewable/Sustainable Energy Technologies Adoption: Indian Perspective, 41 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 762 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.077
32. Martín M. & Grossmann I.E. Optimal Integration of Renewable Based Processes for Fuels and Power Production: Spain Case Study, 213 Appl. Energy 595 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.121
33. Michelsen C.C. & Madlener R. Switching from Fossil Fuel to Renewables in Residential Heating Systems: An Empirical Study of Homeowners’ Decisions in Germany, 89 Energy Pol’y 95 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.018
34. Ming Z. et al. Overall Review of Distributed Energy Development in China: Status Quo, Barriers and Solutions, 50 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 1226 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.065
35. Moula M.E. et al. Researching Social Acceptability of Renewable Energy Technologies in Finland, 2(1) Int’l J. Sustain. Built Env’t 89 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2013.10.001
36. Nalan Ç.B. et al. Renewable Energy Market Conditions and Barriers in Turkey, 13(6-7) Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 1428 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.001
37. Nordman E. & Mutinda J. Biodiversity and Wind Energy in Kenya: Revealing Landscape and Wind Turbine Perceptions in the World’s Wildlife Capital, 19 Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.05.020
38. Notton G. Importance of Islands in Renewable Energy Production and Storage: The Situation of the French Islands, 47 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 260 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.053
39. Oikonomou E.K. et al. Renewable Energy Sources (RES) Projects and Their Barriers on a Regional Scale: The Case Study of Wind Parks in the Dodecanese Islands, Greece, 37(11) Energy Pol’y 4874 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.050
40. Pelau C. & Pop N.Al. Implications for the Energy Policy Derived from the Relation between the Cultural Dimensions of Hofstede’s Model and the Consumption of Renewable Energies, 118 Energy Pol’y 160 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.042
41. Rezaee M.J. et al. Root Barriers Management in Development of Renewable Energy Resources in Iran: An Interpretative Structural Modeling Approach, 129 Energy Pol’y 292 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.030
42. Riti J.S. et al., Does Renewable Energy Ensure Environmental Quality in Favour of Economic Growth? Empirical Evidence from China’s Renewable Development, 52(5) Quality & Quantity 2007 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0577-5
43. Rubini L. ‘The Wide and the Narrow Gate’: Benchmarking in the SCM Agreement After the Canada–Renewable Energy/FIT Ruling, 14(2) World Trade Rev. 211 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474745615000026
44. Schill W.P. et al. Solar Prosumage: An Economic Discussion of Challenges and Opportunities in Energy Transition 703 (Jens Lowitzsch ed., 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93518-8_29
45. Seetharaman M. et al. Breaking Barriers in Deployment of Renewable Energy, 5(1) Heliyon e01166 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01166
46. Steg L. et al. The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions, 46 Env’t Behav. 163 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512454730
47. Suphi S.O. Green Energy Engineering: Opening a Green Way for the Future, 142 J. Clean. Prod. 3095 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.158
48. Thollander P. & Palm J. Barriers to Energy Efficiency: Theoretical Baseline, Previous Research, and Methodological Approaches in Thollander P. & Palm J. Improving Energy Efficiency in Industrial Energy Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Barriers, Energy Audits, Energy Management, Policies, and Programs 35 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4162-4_3
49. Trainer T. Can Renewables Meet Total Australian Energy Demand: A “Disaggregated” Approach, 109 Energy Pol’y 539 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.040
50. Trainer T. Some Problems in Storing Renewable Energy, 110 Energy Pol’y 386 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.061
51. Valer R.L. et al. Issues in PV Systems Applied to Rural Electrification in Brazil, 78 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 1033 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.016
52. Vallecha H. & Bhola P. Sustainability and Replicability Framework: Actor Network Theory Based Critical Case Analysis of Renewable Community Energy Projects in India, 108 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.053
53. Yaqoot M. et al. Review of Barriers to the Dissemination of Decentralized Renewable Energy Systems, 58 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 477 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.224
54. Zárate-Toledo E. et al. Justice, Social Exclusion and Indigenous Opposition: A Case Study of Wind Energy Development on the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico, 54 Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.004
55. Zhang L. et al. Turning Green into Gold: A Review on the Economics of Green Buildings, 172 J. Clean. Prod. 2234 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.188
For citation:
Ljovkina A., Brody M., Karagulyan E., Zakharova A., Ljovkin V. Renewable Energy in Russia: System Analysis of Barriers. BRICS Law Journal. 2021;8(2):89-119. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-2-89-119
Views: 322
Email this article 