Preview

BRICS Law Journal

Advanced search

Transitional Justice in South Africa and Brazil: Introducing a Gendered Approach to Reconciliation

https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2019-6-2-82-107

Full Text:

Abstract

The concept of transitional justice has been associated with the periods of political change when a country emerges from a war or turmoil and attempts to address the wrongdoings of the past. Among various instruments of transitional justice, truth commissions stand out as an example of a non-judicial form of addressing the crimes of the past. While their setup and operation can be criticized on different grounds, including excessive politization of hearings and the virtual impossibility of meaningfully assessing their impact, it has been widely acknowledged in the literature that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa can be regarded as a success story due to its relatively strong mandate and widespread coverage and resonance it had in South African society. We would like to compare this commission from the 1990s with a more recent example, the Brazilian National Truth Commission, so as to be able to address the question of incorporation of gendered aspects in transitional justice (including examination of sexual violence cases, representation of women in truth-telling bodies, etc.), since gender often remains an overlooked and silenced aspect in such initiatives. Gendered narratives of transitional justice often do not fit into the wider narratives of post-war reconciliation. A more general question addressed in this research is whether the lack of formal procedure in truth commissions facilitates or hinders examination of sexual crimes in transitional settings.

About the Authors

G. Nelaeva
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation

Galina Nelaeva  – Professor, Department of Modern History and World Politics, Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities 

38 Lenina St., Tyumen, 625000, Russia



N. Sidorova
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation

Natalia Sidorova – Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure, Institute of State and Law

38 Lenina St., Tyumen, 625000, Russia



References

1. Brouneus K. The Trauma of Truth Telling: Effects of Witnessing in the Rwandan Gacaca Courts on Psychological Health, 54(3) Journal of Conflict Resolution 408 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002709360322

2. Costa Pinto A. Authoritarian Legacies, Transitional Justice and State Crisis in Portugal’s Democratization, 13(2) Democratization 173 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340500523895

3. Evenson E.M. Truth and Justice in Sierra Leone: Coordination Between Commission and Court, 104(3) Columbia Law Review 730 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2307/4099329

4. Gibson J.L. Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? (New York and Cape Town: Russell Sage Foundation, 2004).

5. Gil Gil A. The Flaws of the Scilingo Judgment, 3(5) Journal of International Criminal Justice 1082 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqi077

6. Girelli G. Understanding Transitional Justice: A Struggle for Peace, Reconciliation, and Rebuilding (Cham: Springer, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53606-4

7. Horne C. Building Trust and Democracy: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Countries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793328.001.0001

8. Huyse L. Justice After Transition: On the Choices Successor Elites Make in Dealing with the Past, 20(1) Law & Social Inquiry 51 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1086/492498

9. Kiss C. The Misuses of Manipulation: The Failure of Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Hungary, 58(6) Europe-Asia Studies 925 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130600831142

10. Lambourne W. & Rodriguez Carreon V. Engendering Transitional Justice: A Transformative Approach to Building Peace and Attaining Human Rights for Women, 17(1) Human Rights Review 71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-015-0376-0

11. Linton S. Women Accused of International Crimes: A Trans-Disciplinary Inquiry and Methodology, 27(2) Criminal Law Forum 159 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-016-9280-9

12. Owens I. et al. Stories of Silence: Women, Truth and Reconciliation, 30 Agenda 66 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/4065784

13. Pendas D.O. Retroactive Law and Proactive Justice: Debating Crimes Against Humanity in Germany, 1945–1950, 43(3) Central European History 428 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008938910000361

14. Porter E. Gendered Narratives: Stories and Silences in Transitional Justice, 17(1) Human Rights Review 35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-015-0389-8

15. Ross F. Bearing Witness: Women and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa (London: Pluto Press, 2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt18fs5dm

16. Sarkin J. Carrots and Sticks: The TRC and the South African Amnesty Process (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2005).

17. Stuit H. Ubuntu Strategies: Constructing Spaces of Belonging in Contemporary South African Culture (London: Palgrave, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58009-2

18. Tabak S. False Dichotomies of Transitional Justice: Gender, Conflict and Combatants in Columbia, 44 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 103 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1926956


For citation:


Nelaeva G., Sidorova N. Transitional Justice in South Africa and Brazil: Introducing a Gendered Approach to Reconciliation. BRICS Law Journal. 2019;6(2):82-107. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2019-6-2-82-107

Views: 237


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2409-9058 (Print)
ISSN 2412-2343 (Online)