The Biotechnologization of Law in the Context of Scientific and Technological Advancement
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2026-13-2-96-114
Abstract
The article presents the authors’ conceptual vision of a new stage in the development of law as a social regulator, a stage that is predetermined by the biotechnologization of human activity. The purpose of the study is to articulate the foundational vectors of potential transformations of law—both at the doctrinal level and within the sphere of legal implementation—under the influence of two constitutive factors of the contemporary context: biotechnology and artificial intelligence. Proceeding from the premise that the emerging reality substantively reshapes a number of elements traditionally regarded as axiomatic within legal theory, the authors outline possible trajectories for the further development of law under conditions of biotechnologization. Particular attention is paid to the methodological grounds of such transformation, which are determined, inter alia, by changes in the very nature of the human being, the modification of fundamental legal conceptual and categorical units, as well as shifts in the content of legal relations associated with the emergence of novel features of subject–object interactions. Each identified methodological ground necessitates the revision of existing doctrinal and regulatory approaches, which allows biotechnologization to be conceptualized as a new point of legal development in the current socio-technological environment. This conclusion is supported by emerging trends in normative regulation, demonstrated through the authors’ analysis of BRICS countries, namely the Russian Federation, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, and India.
Keywords
biotechnologization,
biotechnology,
artificial intelligence,
legal system,
legal regulation,
BRICS,
Russian Federation,
Brazil,
India,
China
Supporting agencies: This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Project FEWZ-2024-0052.
About the Authors
I. Yapryntsev
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan Yapryntsev – Director, School of Law and Governance
38 Lenina St., Tyumen, 625000
A. Zorina
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandra Zorina – Senior Lector, Academic Department, School of Law and Governance
38 Lenina St., Tyumen, 625000
References
1. Aith, F. M. A., & Dourado, D. A. (2022). The regulation of artificial intelligence for health in Brazil begins with the General Personal Data Protection Law. Revista de Saúde Pública, 56, Article e2022056004461. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004461. (In Portuguese).
2. Ashok, P. (2023). The curious case of automated decision-making in India. International Cybersecurity Law Review, 4, 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-022-00078-3
3. Avila Negri, S. M. C. (2021). Robot as legal person: Electronic personhood in robotics and artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, Article 789327. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.789327
4. Banteka, N. (2024). Legal personhood and AI. In E. Lim & P. Morgan (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of private law and artificial intelligence (Chapter 28). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108980197.033
5. Buiten, M., et al. (2023). The law and economics of AI liability. Computer Law & Security Review, 49, Article 105761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105794
6. Chesterman, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the limits of legal personality. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(4), 819–844. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00205893200003
7. Cyman, D., Gromova, E., & Juchnevicius, E. (2021). Regulation of artificial intelligence in BRICS and the European Union. BRICS Law Journal, 8(1), 86–115. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-1-86-115
8. Filipova, I. A. (2021). Neurotechnologies: Development, practical application, and legal regulation. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 12(3), 502–521. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.302. (In Russian).
9. Folková, Z. (2024). Beyond dualism(s): A new approach to legal personhood. Iuridica, 70(4), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.159
10. Gordon, J. S. (2021). Artificial moral and legal personhood. AI & Society, 36, 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01063-2
11. Jamwal, V. D. S., & Yadav, A. K. (2023). The Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021: A step in the right direction. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 48(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_169_22
12. John, T., & Czechowicz, A. (2025). Clinical hematopoietic stem cell-based gene therapy. Molecular Therapy, 33(6), 2663–2678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.04.029
13. Khmelevskoi, I. R., & Kalashnikov, N. A. (2025). Responsibility in the field of artificial intelligence systems usage: Features of private and public law regulation. BRICS Law Journal, 12(4), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2025-12-4-147-166
14. Kiškis, M. (2023). Legal framework for the coexistence of humans and conscious AI. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 1205465. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1205465
15. Kurki, V. A. J. (2019). A theory of legal personhood. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844037.001.0001
16. Lima, G., et al. (2021). The conflict between people’s urge to punish AI and legal systems. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, Article 756242. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.756242
17. Llorca, D. F., Fernández, L., & Gómez, L. (2023). Liability regimes in the age of artificial intelligence: A use-case driven analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 76, 613–644. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.14565
18. Machin, R., et al. (2020). Assisted reproductive technologies in Brazil: Characterization of centers and profiles of treated patients. JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 24(3), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200001
19. Mocanu, D. M. (2022). Gradient legal personhood for AI systems: Painting continental legal shapes made to fit analytical molds. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, Article 788179. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.788179
20. Mokhov, S. V. (2020). The history of death: How we fight and how we accept. Individuum. (In Russian).
21. Novelli, C., Bongiovanni, G., & Sartor, G. (2022). A conceptual framework for legal personality and its application to AI. Jurisprudence, 13(2), 194–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2021.2010936
22. Pestrikova, A. A. (2023). Legal regulation of genetic editing in clinical practice: Problems and prospects. Medical Law, 2, 18–23. (In Russian).
23. Popova, O. V. (2021). The body as a territory of technologies: From social engineering to the ethics of biotechnological construction. Kakon Plus. (In Russian).
24. Sihlahla, I., et al. (2025). Legal and ethical principles governing the use of artificial intelligence in radiology services in South Africa. Developing World Bioethics, 25(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12436
25. Smajdor, A. (2023). Whole body gestational donation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 44(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-022-09599-8
26. Soares, E. (2017). Brazil: New rules approved for assisted reproduction. Library of Congress Global Legal Monitor. https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2017-11-20/brazil-new-rules-approved-for-assisted-reproduction/
27. Soyer, B., & Tettenborn, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence and civil liability: Do we need a new regime? International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 30(4), 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaad001
28. Trikoz, E. N., Mustafina-Bredikhina, D. M., & Gulyaeva, E. E. (2021). Legal regulation of gene editing procedures: The experience of the United States and EU countries. RUDN Journal of Law, 25(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2021-25-1-67-86. (In Russian).
29. Trubina, V. A. (2020). Human tissues and organs as objects of civil rights. Infotropic Media. (In Russian).
30. Tzimas, T. (2015). Deconstructing Anthropos: A critical legal reflection on “anthropocentric” law and Anthropocene “humanity”. Law and Critique, 26(3), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-015-9159-8
31. Tzimas, T. (2025). Legal anthropocentrism at crossroads: International legal principles ahead of transhumanism and post-anthropocentrism. European Journal of Law and Technology, 16(1). https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/1087
32. van Est, R. (2014). Intimate technology: The battle for our body and behavior. Rathenau Instituut. https://www.rathenau.nl/sites/default/files/2018-04/Intimate_Technology_-_the_battle_for_our_body_and_behaviourpdf_01.pdf
33. Vidalis, T. (2022). The emergence of biolaw: The European experience and the evolutionary approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02359-0
34. Yudin, B. G. (2006). The place of anthropological problems in bioethics. In Bioethics Working Papers, Issue 1: Bioethics: Anthropological Problems (pp. 3–10). Moscow University for the Humanities Press. (In Russian).
35. Zhou, H., Edelman, B., & Skolnick, J. (2025). A mode-of-action protein-based approach that characterizes the relationships among most major diseases. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 9668. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93377-8
36. Zorina, А., & Yapryntsev, I. (2024). Images of corporeality in law: The experience of the BRICS countries. BRICS Law Journal, 11(1), 58–83. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-1-58-83
Review
For citations:
Yapryntsev I., Zorina A. The Biotechnologization of Law in the Context of Scientific and Technological Advancement. BRICS Law Journal. 2026;13(2):96-114. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2026-13-2-96-114
Views:
50
JATS XML
Email this article 