Preview

BRICS Law Journal

Advanced search

The Problems of Information Sovereignty in the BRICS Countries

https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2026-13-1-76-88

Abstract

This article illustrates the nature and significance of information sovereignty in the expanding BRICS regions. The study adopts an approach that considers sovereignty as an integral system of political and legal relations, institutions, and values. Its main components include technological and ideological elements. In the context of growing global information challenges and threats, it is necessary to implement a targeted state policy to ensure information sovereignty for BRICS member states and their joint efforts to defend the interests of the global majority. To ensure information sovereignty, it is necessary to combine the tools of the so-called “information shield” and “information sword” in the information policy. BRICS serves as a communication platform that facilitates the effective exchange of best practices. As an expanded format, BRICS can make greater use of the advantages of “soft power,” which affirms the legitimacy of decisions by garnering the support of representatives of developing countries. BRICS has significant potential in the field of coordination and the formation of common principles and approaches to the implementation of information sovereignty. It also allows for the expansion of a common approach by involving developing countries in cooperation and extending the norms and rules of information sovereignty to the countries of the global majority.

About the Author

E. L. Andreeva
Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation

Elena L. Andreeva – Professor, Head, Centre of Regional Comparative Research, Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Science

29 Moskovskaya St., Yekaterinburg, 620014



References

1. Damon, L. (1986). Freedom of information versus national sovereignty: The need for a new global forum for the resolution of transborder data fl w problems. Fordham International Law Journal, 10(2), 262–287.

2. De Filippi, P., & McCarthy, S. (2012). Cloud computing: Centralization and data sovereignty. European Journal of Law and Technology, 3(2). http://ssrn.com/abstract=2167372

3. Drake, W. J., & Price, M. E. (2014). Beyond NETmundial: The roadmapforinstitutional improvements to the Global Internet Governance Ecosystem. University of Pennsylvania. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-99003

4. Efremov, A. A. (2017). Formation of the concept of state information sovereignty. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 1, 201–215. https://doi.org/10.17323/20728166.2017.1.201.215. (In Russian).

5. Gavra, D. P., Savitskaya, A. S., & Shishkin, D. P. (2011). External image of the state in the media space. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University, 9(3), 187–196. (In Russian).

6. Gong, W. (2005). Information sovereignty reviewed. Intercultural Communication Studies, 14(1), 119–135.

7. Kucheryavyy, M. M., & Vovenda,Yu. V. (2016). Regional information security within the framework of the Eurasian integration. Administrative Consulting, 7, 19–26. (In Russian).

8. Lazanyuk, I. V., Shkvarya, L. V., & Eeberdyeva, M. M. (2025). Development of AI in the BRICS countries: Synergy to reduce digital inequality. Vostok (Oriens), 1, 182–194. https://doi.org/10.31696/s086919080033712-0. (In Russian).

9. Olejnik, G. V. (2023). BRICS national interests in the field of scientific and technological cooperation. Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin, 3, 29–40. (In Russian).

10. Perrit, J. (1998). The internet as a threat to sovereignty? Thoughts on the internet’s role in strengthening national and global governance. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 5(2), 423–442.

11. Price, M. E. (2002). Media and sovereignty: The global information revolution and its challenge to state power. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4533.001.0001

12. Rossoshansky, A. V. (2011). Political and informational sovereignty in context of globalization processes. Simbirsk Scientifi Journal Vestnik, 4(6), 176–186. (In Russian).

13. Terentieva, L. V. (2010). Cyberspace and state borders: Jurisdictional issues on the Internet. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 1, 63–68. (In Russian).

14. Toloraya, G. D., et al. (2023). Promising directions of scientific cooperation: BRICS countries (Report No. 90). Russian International Affairs Council. (In Russian).

15. Zorina, E. G. (2017). Information sovereignty of the modern state and the main instruments for ensuring it. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Sociology. Political Science, 17(3), 345–348. https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2017-17-3-345-(In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Andreeva E.L. The Problems of Information Sovereignty in the BRICS Countries. BRICS Law Journal. 2026;13(1):77-88. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2026-13-1-76-88

Views: 76

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2409-9058 (Print)
ISSN 2412-2343 (Online)