Territories with a Special Regime in BRICS Countries
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2025-12-3-81-100
Abstract
This research presents a comparative analysis of territories with special legal regimes in the BRICS member countries. It examines both the theoretical foundations and the practical aspects of the functioning of territories with special status. The study examines such features as the legal status, purposes, and ways behind their creation, as well as their impact on the socio-economic development of the country. Based on legal analysis and regulatory practices, the authors propose a classification of these territories into five categories: administrative, unrecognized (or with limited recognition), economic (special economic zones), ecological (specially protected natural areas), and ethnic. The findings of this study aim to contribute to a deeper understanding of the effectiveness and developmental prospects of such territories within the context of the legal framework of the Russian Federation.
About the Authors
S. VasilievRussian Federation
Stanislav Vasiliev – Associate Professor, Head, Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law
33 Universitetskaya St., Sevastopol, 299053
Yu. Motsnaya
Russian Federation
Yulia Motsnaya – Junior Researcher, Scientific Expert Center
33 Universitetskaya St., Sevastopol, 299053
L. Potapova
Russian Federation
Lyubov Potapova – Junior Researcher, Scientific Expert Center
33 Universitetskaya St., Sevastopol, 299053
References
1. Balgabaeva, G. B., & Novakova, O. V. (2018). Constitutional and legal status of Hong Kong and Macao after joining the PRC. Asia and Africa Today, 10(735), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750000866-4. (In Russian).
2. Burundukova, E. M., & Kostina O. V. (2020). Territories of traditional nature management of the indigenous small-numbered peoples of the North: Land use rights and their protection. Current Issues of Modern Economics, 10, 520–528. https://doi.org/10.34755/IROK.2020.50.64.137. (In Russian).
3. Cashman, G., & Robinson, L. C. (2021). An introduction to the causes of war: Patterns of interstate conflict from World War I to Iraq. Rowman & Littlefield.
4. Connor, W. (1994). Ethnonationalism: The quest for understanding. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691186962
5. Devina, Y. R. (2022). Classification of territorial disputes by time of occurrence. LLC VVM Publishing.
6. Gladun, E., & Zadorin, M. (2023). The system of indigenous peoples’ protection in BRICS states: An overview of legal and litigation support. BRICS Law Journal, 10(4), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-4-121-141
7. Hoveka, L. N., van der Bank, M., & Davies, T. J. (2020). Evaluating the performance of aprotected area network in South Africa and its implications for megadiverse countries. Biological Conservation, 248, 108577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108577
8. Irkhin, I. V. (2019). Territories with special status within federal states: A constitutional and legal study. INFRA-M. https://doi.org/10.12737/monography_5c3dc6e37850a6.50744079. (In Russian).
9. Koval, A. G. (2020). Special economic zones as a factor of the development of BRICS states. Latin America, 11, 20–38. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044748X0011910-0. (In Russian).
10. Kumar, A., Rudenko, V., & Filippova, N. (2021). Constitutionalization of national minority rights in BRICS countries (Brazil, India and Russia). BRICS Law Journal, 8(3), 30–66. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-3-30-66
11. Kuznetsov, A., & Kuznetsova, O. (2019). The success and failure of Russian SEZs: Some policy lessons. Transnational Corporations, 2(26), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.18356/89dba835-en. (In Russian).
12. Likhareva, T. S. (2023). Peculiarities of the development of ecological tourism on the basis of specially protected natural territories. Service in Russia and Abroad, 3(105), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8148701. (In Russian).
13. Lin, G. (2015). Features of state regulation of China’s economy in modern trends. Economics and Management: A New View, 37(1), 56–60.
14. Markedonov, S. (2018). De facto states: Post-Soviet space. Vestnik RSUH. Series: Political Science. History. International Relations, 1(11), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2018-1-24-40. (In Russian).
15. Mochalov, A. N. (2017). Territorial structure of India in the conditions of ethnocultural diversity. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 5(66), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.12737/article_59bbac1ca98527.96839626. (In Russian).
16. Mochalov, A. N. (2017). Territorial structure of the state as a way of managing ethnic diversity (constitutional and legal regulation in BRICS countries). Law. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 3, 134–173. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2017.2.154.173. (In Russian).
17. Ozdeadzhieva, S. M. (2022). On the legal regime of specially protected natural areas. State Service and Personnel, 2, 116–118. https://doi.org/10.24412/2312-0444-2022-2-116-118. (In Russian).
18. Shevchuk, N. V. (2018). Involvement without recognition: A new dimension of the international legal status of de facto states. World Economy and International Relations, 66(6), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-6-124-134. (In Russian).
19. Yawen, L. (2015). China’s policy on the Taiwan issue in the 21st century. Kazan Bulletin of Young Scientists, 3(4/12), 135–141.
20. Znamenshchikov, A. O. (2019). Sevastopol: Features of local self-government within the framework of a federal city. Management Consulting, 5(125), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-5-131-139. (In Russian).
21. Zolotukhin, I. N. (2022). Regional agenda of Ethiopia in modern geopolitical realities of Africa in Oikumena. Regional Studies, 3(62), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.24866/1998-6785/2022-3/143-150. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Vasiliev S., Motsnaya Yu., Potapova L. Territories with a Special Regime in BRICS Countries. BRICS Law Journal. 2025;12(3):81-100. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2025-12-3-81-100