CCTV and Crime Prevention Effectiveness: Experience of Hungary
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2025-12-1-40-55
Abstract
This article examines the influence of CCTV on the realization of the person`s intention to commit a crime. The authors present the results of their own research which was conducted among Hungarian prison population (172 respondents) using a questionnaire method. The questionnaires were of a survey-type with a closed set of questions. The research sought to determine how offenders relate to CCTV, its role in crime prevention, and whether any differences in attitudes towards CCTV can be observed in terms of age and time spent in prison. In the course of the research, it was found that a significant negative correlation can be found between the time spent in a penitentiary institution and the fear of CCTV among those who spent more time in prison. Furthermore, it was also determined that the deterrent power of cameras is comparable to that of uniformed police officers. Research showed that CCTV’s effectiveness depends on factors such as camera placement, real-time monitoring, and integration with police patrols. While studies confirm reductions in certain crime types – particularly property crime and offenses in urban areas – other findings suggest CCTV primarily displaces crime geographically rather than preventing it. Offenders perceive cameras as deterrents in visible, well-monitored spaces, but this effect diminishes with sporadic deployment or inadequate implementation. This finding has significant criminological and national economic significance.
About the Authors
V. Vári
Ludovika University of Public Service
Hungary
Hungary
Vince Vári – Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Procedure Law, Faculty of Law Enforcement
2 Ludovika Tér, Budapest, H-1083
Sz. Mátyá
Ludovika University of Public Service
Hungary
Hungary
Szabolcs Mátyás – Associate Professor, Department of Criminology, Faculty of Law Enforcement
2 Ludovika Tér, Budapest, H-1083
M. Tihanyi
Ludovika University of Public
Hungary
Hungary
Miklós Tihanyi – Associate Professor, Department of Public Safety, Faculty of Law Enforcement
2 Ludovika Tér, Budapest, H-1083
K. Krasnova
North-West Branch of the Russian State University of Justice named after V.M. Lebedev
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kristina Krasnova – Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law, Faculty of Training Specialists for the Judiciary (Law Faculty)
5 Alexandrovsky Park, Saint Petersburg, 197046
References
1. Armitage, R., Smyth, G., & Pease, K. (1999). Burnley CCTV evaluation. In K. Painter & N. Tilley (Eds), Surveillance of public space: CCTV, street lighting and crime prevention (pp. 225–250). Criminal Justice Press.
2. Ashby, M.P.J. (2017). The Value of CCTV CCTV as an Investigative Tool: An Empirical Analysis. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 23, 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-017-9341-6
3. Cerezo, A. (2013). CCTV and crime displacement: A quasi-experimental evaluation. European Journal of Criminology, 10, 222–236.
4. Clarke, R.V. (1995). Situational crime prevention: Its theoretical basis and practical scope. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research. Vol. 4 (p. 225–255). University of Chicago Press.
5. Clarke, R.V. (1997). Introduction. In R.V. Clarke (Ed.), Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd ed.) (pp. 9–10). Harrow and Heston.
6. Clarke, R.V. (2000). Situational prevention, criminology, and social values. In A. von Hirsch, D. Garland & A. Wakefield (Eds.), Ethical and social perspectives on situational crime prevention (pp. 97–112). Hart.
7. Cornish, D.B., & Clarke, R.V. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. In M.J. Smith & D.B. Cornish (Eds.), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention (pp. 41–96). Criminal Justice Press.
8. Coupe, T., & Kaur, S. (2005). The Role of Alarms and CCTV in Detecting Nonresidential Burglary. Security Journal, 18(2), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.sj.8340198.
9. Csege, G., & Mátyás, S. (2018). Térfigyelő rendszerek hazai szabályozása empirikus kutatások és a biztonsági kihívások tükrében. Jog Állam Politika: Jog-és politikatudományi folyóirat, 3, 163–172. (In Hungarian).
10. Dávid, L., et al. (2007). Biztonság, terrorizmus, turizmus. Gazdálkodás, 51 (különkiadás), 161–166. (In Hungarian).
11. Dmitrieva, A., Alshdaifat, Sh., & Pastukhov, P. (2023). The Features of the Use of Information Technologies in Criminal Proceedings in the BRICS Countries. BRICS Law Journal, 10(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-1-88-108
12. Gerell, M. (2016). Hot spot policing with actively monitored CCTV cameras. International Criminal Justice Review, 26(2), 187–201.
13. Goold, B.J. (2004). CCTV and policing: Public area surveillance and police practices in Britain. Oxford University Press.
14. Horgos, L., et al. (2018). The importance of data compilation in criminalistics. Journal of the National University “Ostroh Academy”. Series “Law”, 1(17), 1–14. (In Ukranian).
15. Krasnova, K. (2024). Using CCTV for law enforcement operations and public safety. Criminal Geograthical Journal, 1-2, 9–14.
16. Krasnova, K.A. (2024). Preventive action of video surveillance in public places: the experience of St. Petersburg. Scientific works of the Almaty Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after M. Esbulatov, 1(78), 183–188.
17. La Vigne, N.G., & Lowry, S.S. (2011). Evaluation of camera use to prevent crimes in commuter parking facilities: A randomized control trial. URBAN Institute. Lim, H., & Wilcox, P. (2017). Crime-reduction effects of open-street CCTV: Conditionality considerations. Justice Quarterly, 34, 597–626.
18. Mátyás, S. (2015). Szubjektív biztonságérzet – lakossági vélemény a közbiztonságról és a rendőrségről. Magyar Rendészet, 5, 159–170. (In Hungarian).
19. Norris, C. (2007). The intensification and bifurcation of surveillance in British criminal justice policy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 13, 139–158.
20. Norris, C., & Armstrong, G. (1999). The maximum surveillance society: The rise of CCTV. Berg.
21. Norris, C., & McCahill, M. (2006). CCTV: Beyond penal modernism? British Journal of Criminology, 46, 97–118.
22. Piza, E., et al. (2019). CCTV surveillance for crime prevention: A 40-year systematic review with meta analysis. Criminology & Public Policy, 18, 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12419.
23. Piza, E.L., Caplan, J.M., & Kennedy, L.W. (2014). Analyzing the influence of micro-level factors on CCTV camera effect. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 237–264.
24. Piza, E.L., et al. (2015). The effects of merging proactive CCTV monitoring with directed police patrol: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9211-x
25. Ratcliffe, J.H. (2011). Video surveillance of public places. Problem-Oriented Guides for Police Response Guides Series. Center for Problem-Oriented Policing.
26. Sallai, J., et al. (2016). A „jó rendészet” közpolitikai kapcsolódási lehetőségei. In K. Tamás (Ed.), A jó állam nagyító alatt: speciális jelentések A-tól V-ig (az adóbürokráciától a versenyképességig). Dialóg Campus Kiadó. (In Hungarian).
27. Sivarajasingam, V., & Shepherd, J.P. (1999). Effect of closed circuit television on urban violence. Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine, 16, 255–257.
28. Tihanyi, M. (2017). Közrend, közbiztonság, rendészet a keresztény közgondolkodásban. In Államtudományi Műhelytanulmányok. (In Hungarian).
29. Tihanyi, M., Vári, V. & Krasnova, K.A. (2024). Ethics of Sin and Punishment. Kutafin Law Review, 11(4), 741–760. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2024.4.30.741-760.
30. Vollaard, B. & Hamed, J. (2012). Why the police have an effect on violent crime after all: Evidence from the British Crime Survey. Journal of Law and Economics, 55(4), 901–924.
31. Welsh, B.C., & Farrington, D.P. (2008). Effects of closed circuit television surveillance on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2008.17.
32. Yun, W. (2021). A study on the selection of the CCTV location for crime prevention. J-Institute, 6, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.22471/Regulations.2021.6.4.14.
Review
For citations:
Vári V., Mátyá S., Tihanyi M., Krasnova K. CCTV and Crime Prevention Effectiveness: Experience of Hungary. BRICS Law Journal. 2025;12(1):40-55. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2025-12-1-40-55
Views:
201
Email this article 