Problems of Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands in China
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-4-168-188
Abstract
The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat (Ramsar Convention) was signed in February 1971 in Ramsar, Iran, and currently has 172 parties. China acceded to this Convention in 1992, became the 67th party, and was elected a member of the Standing Committee in 2005. Wetlands conservation in China has achieved some positive results, but it still faces serious challenges. China’s wetlands level is much lower than the world average (global wetlands level is 8.60%), and the wetlands area per capita is only 1/5 of the world average. Until 2022, China lacked legislation to protect wetlands; the article’s objective is to analyze the recently adopted Chinese legislation in this area. Ultimately, the authors conclude that it is necessary to strengthen legal standards in China to contribute to the conservation and restoration of global wetlands.
About the Authors
A. Solntsev
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander Solntsev (Moscow, Russian Federation) – Associate Professor, Department of International Law, Institute of Law
6 Miklukho-Maklaia St., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation
G. Chen
Heilongjiang University
China
China
Chen Guixin (Harbin, China) – Teaching Assistant, Department of International Law, Institute of Law, Heilongjiang University; PhD, Department of International Law, Institute of Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
6 Miklukho-Maklaia St., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation
References
1. Bridgewater, P., & Kim, R. E. (2021). The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands at 50. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 5(3), 268–270. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01392-5
2. Chen, G. (2022). China as a Party to the Ramsar Convention. Eurasian Journal of International Law, 2(2), 92–107. (In Russian).
3. Chen, G. (2023). Analysis of the Results of the 14 th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (COP14). Eurasian Law Journal, 3(178), 48–51. (In Russian).
4. Chen, G. (2024). The Concept of Ecological Civilization in the Constitution of the PRC. Russian Judge, 9, 51–55. (In Russian).
5. Erwin, K. L. (2009). Wetlands and Global Climate Change: The Role of Wetland Restoration in a Changing World. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 17(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-008-9119-1
6. Fluet-Chouinard, E., et al. (2023). Extensive Global Wetland Loss over the Past Three Centuries. Nature, 614(7947), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05572-6
7. Gaget, E., et al. (2020). Assessing the Effectiveness of the Ramsar Convention in Preserving Wintering Waterbirds in the Mediterranean. Biological Conservation, 243, Article 108485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108485
8. He, Y., & Xiong, X. (1994). On the Characteristics of the Wetland Ecosystem. Environmental Protection in Agriculture, 13(6), 275–278. (In Chinese).
9. Kleijn, D., et al. (2014). Waterbirds Increase More Rapidly in Ramsar Designated Wetlands Then in Unprotected Wetlands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(2), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12193
10. Kopylov, M. N., & Solntsev, A. M. (2012). Ramsar Convention’s 40 th Anniversary. Journal of Russian Law, 3(183), 105–112. (In Russian).
11. Kou, J. (2022). The Rule of Law Protects the Beauty of Wetland. People’s Daily. (In Chinese).
12. Kvanina, V., Kovalenko, E., & Vypkhanova, G. (2023). Improving the Legislation on Public-Private Partnerships in Environmental Protection in the BRICS Countries. BRICS Law Journal, 10(3), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-3-106-121
13. Likhacheva, A., Kalachyhin, H., Abdolova, S., & Kamenkovich, N. (2021). Water Dimension of BRICS Cooperation: National Challenges and Joint Opportunities. BRICS Law Journal, 8(2), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-2-41-65
14. Liu, L. (2021). Research on the Controversial Issues of Wetlands Conservation Law. Beijing Jiaotong University. (In Chinese).
15. Mao, D., et al. (2021). Remote Observations in China’s Ramsar Sites: Wetland Dynamics, Anthropogenic Threats, and Implications for Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2021, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9849343
16. McInnes, R. J., et al. (2017). Wetland Ecosystem Services and the Ramsar Convention: An Assessment of Needs. Wetlands, 37(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-016-0849-1
17. Nunes, C. M., Anderaos, A. A., & Leal, M. D. A. C. (2021). The 2020 Reform of the Water and Sanitation Services Sector in Brazil. BRICS Law Journal, 8(2), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-2-66-88
18. Padonou, E. A., et al. (2021). How Far Are Mangrove Ecosystems in Benin (West Africa) Conserved by the Ramsar Convention? Land Use Policy, 108, Article 105583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105583
19. Solntsev, A. M. (2018). Climate Change: International Legal Dimension. Moscow Journal of International Law, 106(1), 60–78. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2018-1-60-78
20. Vymazal, J. (2022). The Historical Development of Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. Land, 11(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020174
Review
For citations:
Solntsev A., Chen G. Problems of Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands in China. BRICS Law Journal. 2024;11(4):168-188. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-4-168-188
Views:
749
Email this article 