Preview

BRICS Law Journal

Advanced search

Human Potential of the Constitutions of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China

https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-4-5-20

Abstract

The article describes the issues of preserving and strengthening traditional cultural, spiritual and moral values implemented in the constitutions of BRICS countries on the cases of Russia and China. Russian Constitution with its amendments of 2020 aims at constitutionalizing cultural and moral values, implementing them to the current legislation, and creating economic, political and social conditions for their enforcement. Also, the article examines the activities of non-governmental organizations in the People’s Republic of China with the focus on their contribution to preservation and amplification of cultural and moral values enshrined in the Constitution of China.

About the Author

G. Chebotarev
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Gennady Chebotarev (Tyumen, Russian Federation) – Professor, Research Director, Institute of State and Law, Tyumen State University; Chairman, Public Chamber of the Tyumen Region

6 Volodarskogo St., Tyumen, 625003, Russian Federation



References

1. Berdyaev, N. (2004). Philosophy of Freedom. Fomo. (In Russian).

2. Bondar, N. S. (2008). Judicial Constitutionalism. Norma. (In Russian).

3. Chebotarev, G. N. (2023). Public Chambers as a Special Public-State Institution of Civil Society. Russian Legal Journal, 6(117), pp. 70–80. (In Russian).

4. Ilyin, I. A. (2007). Paths of Russia. Vagrius. (In Russian).

5. Khabrieva, T. Y. (2013). Stages and Main Directions of Constitutionalization of Modern Russian Legislation. Journal of Constitutional Justice, 6(36), 25–30. (In Russian).

6. Kleandrov, M. I. (2021). Russia Needs a New Constitution. Bulletin of Tyumen State University. Series: Socio-Economic and Legal Research, 7(4/28), pp. 139–151. (In Russian).

7. Komarova, V. V., & Rybakov, O. S. (2023). Modern Constitutionalism: On the 85 th Anniversary of the Birth of Academician O. E. Kutafin. Prospekt. (In Russian).

8. Kozhevnikov, O. A. (2021). Local Self-Government as a Constitutional Value: From the Origins to the Current State. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 4(22), 49–56. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2021-4-49-56.

9. Kruss, V. I. (2010). Normativity of Constitutional Values. In V. V. Vitruk & L. A. Nudnenko (Eds.), Constitutional Values: Content and Problems of Implementation: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference of December 4–6, 2008 (pp. 31–41). RAP. (In Russian).

10. Kruss, V. I. (2016). Constitutionalization of Law: Foundations of Theory. Norma. (In Russian).

11. Kutafin, O. E. (2008). Russian Constitutionalism. Norma. (In Russian).

12. Maltsev, G. V. (2008). Moral Foundations of Law. Saratov State University Publishing House. (In Russian).

13. Salikov, M. S., & Goncharov, M. V. (2020). Constitutional Values at a New Stage of Development of the Basic Law of the Russian Federation. European and Asian Law Review, 1, 61–68. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34076/2619-0672-2020-4-1-60-68

14. Shugrina, E. S. (2021). Local Self-Government on the Scales of Constitutional Value. Journal of Constitutional Justice, 2, 21–31. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4144-2021-2-21-31


Review

For citations:


Chebotarev G. Human Potential of the Constitutions of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China. BRICS Law Journal. 2024;11(4):5-20. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-4-5-20

Views: 438


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2409-9058 (Print)
ISSN 2412-2343 (Online)