<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">bricslawjournal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">BRICS Law Journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Юридический журнал БРИКС</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2409-9058</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2412-2343</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Publishing House V.Ема</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-1-72-83</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">bricslawjournal-86</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>COMMENTS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>INDIAN REGULATIONS ON ETHICS AND THEIR IMPACT ON COURT CASE BACKLOGS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Chandra</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Assistant Professor &amp; Assistant Director (Clinical Programme), </p><p>Office No. 321, T-1, 3rd Floor, Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, 131001, NCR of Delhi</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">schandra@jgu.edu.in</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="en">Jindal Global Law School<country>India</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>72</fpage><lpage>83</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Chandra S., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Chandra S.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Chandra S.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/86">https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/86</self-uri><abstract><p>The paper aims to explore the role of ethics regulations on the backlog of cases in the state of Uttar Pradesh, India. There, there are many local practices which hinder the disposal of cases in the courts. The paper examines several, beginning with the theoretical training in ethics at the law schools and its impact in practice. The paper then explores the legal status of strikes and how they are conceived by lawyers in delaying the disposal of cases. Next it deals with adjournments in the courts and unravels the myriad frivolous reasons cited in seeking adjournments, as well as how, despite statutory limitations, courts succumb to the pressure of the Bar in granting them. The author echoes concern for creating transparency, efficiency and a system that inspires integrity, and argues for the need to rethink and redesign the whole system and create independent tribunals to enquire into lawyers guilty of professional misconduct.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>case backlog</kwd><kwd>court delays</kwd><kwd>ethics regulations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">th Report of the Law Commission of India (July 2014) (Feb. 20, 2017), available at http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/Report245.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">th Report of the Law Commission of India (July 2014) (Feb. 20, 2017), available at http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/Report245.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chandra S. &amp; Solanki N. Legal Aid in India: Retuning Philosophical Chords, 2(2) BRICS Law Journal 68–85 (2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chandra S. &amp; Solanki N. Legal Aid in India: Retuning Philosophical Chords, 2(2) BRICS Law Journal 68–85 (2015).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chauhan A. UP Tops the List of Pending Cases in Courts across India, The Times of India, November 2, 2015 (Feb. 20, 2017), available at http://timesofindia. indiatimes.com/india/UP-tops-the-list-of-pending-cases-in-courts-across-India/articleshow/49632177.cms.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chauhan A. UP Tops the List of Pending Cases in Courts across India, The Times of India, November 2, 2015 (Feb. 20, 2017), available at http://timesofindia. indiatimes.com/india/UP-tops-the-list-of-pending-cases-in-courts-across-India/articleshow/49632177.cms.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Law Commission of India, Dec. 2002, 184th Report on the Legal Education &amp; Professional Training and Proposals for Amendment to the Advocates Act, 1961 and the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 (Feb. 20, 2017), available at http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/184threport-parti.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Law Commission of India, Dec. 2002, 184th Report on the Legal Education &amp; Professional Training and Proposals for Amendment to the Advocates Act, 1961 and the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 (Feb. 20, 2017), available at http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/184threport-parti.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
