bricslawjournalBRICS Law JournalЮридический журнал БРИКС2409-90582412-2343Publishing House V.Ема10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-1-59-87bricslawjournal-766Research ArticleARTICLECriminal Liability for Cybercrimes in the BRICS CountriesIvanovaL.

Liliya Ivanova (Tyumen, Russia) – Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law

6 Volodarskogo St., Tyumen, 625003

l.v.ivanova@utmn.ruUniversity of TyumenRussian Federation2023190420231015987Copyright © Ivanova L., 20232023Ivanova L.Ivanova L.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/766

One of the areas of cooperation among the BRICS countries is tackling the misuse of information and communication technologies for criminal activities. Each year, the number of cybercrimes continues to grow. Furthermore, the criminal regulation of cybercrimes in each country differs. This article aims to identify the features of criminal liability for cybercrimes in the BRICS countries and offer potential solutions for developing joint legislation initiatives. The primary focus of this discussion is on cybercrime provisions that can be found in the legal acts of the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Russian Federation, the Republic of India, the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of South Africa. The main finding of this research is that the criminal law of each country contains different corpus delicti for dealing with crimes committed in cyberspace. There are also differing conceptions of what constitutes cybercrime. The author proposes the enactment of a common document for the BRICS countries that would contain a shared understanding of cybercrimes as well as the various types of cybercrimes. It is possible to divide cybercrimes into two categories: special cybercrimes committed in the field of computer information and general criminal cybercrimes executed using information technology to commit any other common criminal offences. The results of this research can be used to study the problems of criminal responsibility for cybercrimes in the BRICS countries as well as analyze the ways in which the rules under consideration are actually applied in practice.

cybercrimedigital spaceBrazilRussiaIndiaChinaSouth AfricaBRICSI wish to thank Valeria Evdash, Director of the Center for Academic Writing “Impulse,” University of Tyumen, for her valuable advice during the preparation of this manuscriptReferencesAkhgar B. et al. (eds.). Cyber Crime and Cyber Terrorism Investigator’s Handbook (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-15338-XAkhgar B. et al. (eds.). Cyber Crime and Cyber Terrorism Investigator’s Handbook (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-15338-XArya N. Cyber Crime Scenario in India and Judicial Response, 3(4) International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development 1108 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd24025Arya N. Cyber Crime Scenario in India and Judicial Response, 3(4) International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development 1108 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd24025Azad M.M. et al. Cyber Crime Problem Areas, Legal Areas and the Cyber Crime Law, 3(5) International Journal of New Technology and Research 1 (2017).Azad M.M. et al. Cyber Crime Problem Areas, Legal Areas and the Cyber Crime Law, 3(5) International Journal of New Technology and Research 1 (2017).Brett V.N. An Analysis of Cyber-Incidents in South Africa, 20 African Journal of Information and Communication 113 (2017). https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/23573Brett V.N. An Analysis of Cyber-Incidents in South Africa, 20 African Journal of Information and Communication 113 (2017). https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/23573Chang L.Y. Cybercrime in the Greater China Region. Regulatory Responses and Crime Prevention across the Taiwan Strait (2012). Dasgupta M. Cyber Crime in India – A Comparative Study (2009).Chang L.Y. Cybercrime in the Greater China Region. Regulatory Responses and Crime Prevention across the Taiwan Strait (2012). Dasgupta M. Cyber Crime in India – A Comparative Study (2009).Grabosky P. The Internet, Technology, and Organized Crime, 2 Asian Criminology 145 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-007-9034-zGrabosky P. The Internet, Technology, and Organized Crime, 2 Asian Criminology 145 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-007-9034-zKshetri N. Cybercrime and Cyber-Security Issues Associated with China: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations, 13(1) Electronic Commerce Research 41 (2013). https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9105-4Kshetri N. Cybercrime and Cyber-Security Issues Associated with China: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations, 13(1) Electronic Commerce Research 41 (2013). https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9105-4Kshetri N. Cybercrime and Cybersecurity Issues in the BRICS Economies, 18(4) Journal of Global Information Technology Management 245 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2015.1108093Kshetri N. Cybercrime and Cybersecurity Issues in the BRICS Economies, 18(4) Journal of Global Information Technology Management 245 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2015.1108093Lehto M. & Neittaanmäki P. (eds.). Cyber Security: Analytics, Technology and Automation (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18302-2Lehto M. & Neittaanmäki P. (eds.). Cyber Security: Analytics, Technology and Automation (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18302-2Lu H. et al. A Comparative Analysis of Cybercrimes and Governmental Law Enforcement in China and the United States, 5 Asian Criminology 123 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-010-9092-5Lu H. et al. A Comparative Analysis of Cybercrimes and Governmental Law Enforcement in China and the United States, 5 Asian Criminology 123 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-010-9092-5Malik J.K. & Choudhury S. Privacy and Surveillance: The Law Relating to Cyber Crimes in India, 9(12) Journal of Engineering, Computing and Architecture 83 (2019).Malik J.K. & Choudhury S. Privacy and Surveillance: The Law Relating to Cyber Crimes in India, 9(12) Journal of Engineering, Computing and Architecture 83 (2019).Mitrovic Z. & Thakur S.C. Positioning South Africa in the BRICS Cybersecurity Context: A Strategic Perspective, in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, Stellenbosch Univ, South Africa 251 (2019).Mitrovic Z. & Thakur S.C. Positioning South Africa in the BRICS Cybersecurity Context: A Strategic Perspective, in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, Stellenbosch Univ, South Africa 251 (2019).Mittal S. & Singh A. A Study of Cyber Crime and Perpetration of Cyber Crime in India, in Evolving Issues Surrounding Technoethics and Society in the Digital Age 171 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6122-6.ch011Mittal S. & Singh A. A Study of Cyber Crime and Perpetration of Cyber Crime in India, in Evolving Issues Surrounding Technoethics and Society in the Digital Age 171 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6122-6.ch011Pawar S. & Kolekar Y. Essentials of Information Technology Law (2015).Pawar S. & Kolekar Y. Essentials of Information Technology Law (2015).Subrahmanian V.S. et al. The Global Cyber-Vulnerability Report (2015).Subrahmanian V.S. et al. The Global Cyber-Vulnerability Report (2015).Wang Q. A Comparative Study of Cybercrime in Criminal Law: China, US, England, Singapore and the Council of Europe (2017).Wang Q. A Comparative Study of Cybercrime in Criminal Law: China, US, England, Singapore and the Council of Europe (2017).Korobeev A.I. et al. Cybercrimes in the Russian Federation: Criminological and Criminal Law Analysis of the Situation, 13(3) Russian Journal of Criminology 416 (2019). https:// doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(3)Korobeev A.I. et al. Cybercrimes in the Russian Federation: Criminological and Criminal Law Analysis of the Situation, 13(3) Russian Journal of Criminology 416 (2019). https:// doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(3)Ustinova T.D. Encouragement to Commit Suicide or Assisting with Suicide: Critical Analysis, 3 Lex Russica 151 (2020).Ustinova T.D. Encouragement to Commit Suicide or Assisting with Suicide: Critical Analysis, 3 Lex Russica 151 (2020).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.