<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">bricslawjournal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">BRICS Law Journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Юридический журнал БРИКС</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2409-9058</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2412-2343</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Publishing House V.Ема</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21684/2412-2343-2016-3-4-41-70</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">bricslawjournal-73</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARTICLE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>OVERVIEW OF RUSSIAN CIVIL JUSTICE</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Maleshin</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dmitry Maleshin (Moscow, Russia) – Professor of Civil Procedural Law</p><p>(3 Bol’shoy Trekhsvyatitel’skiy pereulok, Moscow, 109028, Russian Federation)</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">dmitry.maleshin@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>National Research University Higher School of Economics</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>41</fpage><lpage>70</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Maleshin D., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Maleshin D.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Maleshin D.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/73">https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/73</self-uri><abstract><p>Contemporary Russian civil procedure is not a pure Continental model because it also has procedural features of the common law system, as well as some other original and exceptional features. This article examines the main aspects of Russian civil justice: its main principles; judicial organization, including the structure of the courts and the division between courts of general jurisdiction and arbitrazh (commercial) courts, and the Intellectual Property Court; sources of procedural law; bar organization; the jurisdiction of the courts; actions and proceedings; legal costs; evidence; administrative procedure; class actions; enforcement proceedings; and arbitration and mediation.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Russian civil justice</kwd><kwd>class actions</kwd><kwd>enforcement proceedings</kwd><kwd>administrative justice</kwd><kwd>arbitration</kwd><kwd>mediation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berman H.J. Justice in the USSR: An Interpretation of Soviet Law (New York: Vintage Books, 1963).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berman H.J. Justice in the USSR: An Interpretation of Soviet Law (New York: Vintage Books, 1963).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Butler W. Russian Law (3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Butler W. Russian Law (3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cappelletti M. Social and Political Aspects of Civil Procedure: Reforms and Trends in Western and Eastern Europe, 69 Michigan Law Review (1971).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cappelletti M. Social and Political Aspects of Civil Procedure: Reforms and Trends in Western and Eastern Europe, 69 Michigan Law Review (1971).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chenworth D.W. Soviet Civil Procedure: History and Analysis, 67 Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (1977).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chenworth D.W. Soviet Civil Procedure: History and Analysis, 67 Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (1977).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Conlon B. Dostoevsky v. the Judicial Reforms of 1864: How and Why One of NineteenthCentury Russia’s Greatest Writers Criticized the Nation’s Most Successful Reform, 2(4) Russian Law Journal (2014).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Conlon B. Dostoevsky v. the Judicial Reforms of 1864: How and Why One of NineteenthCentury Russia’s Greatest Writers Criticized the Nation’s Most Successful Reform, 2(4) Russian Law Journal (2014).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ferrari F. &amp; Bocharova N. The astreinte in the Italian and Russian Administrative (Judicial) and Civil Proceedings, 3(3) Russian Law Journal (2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ferrari F. &amp; Bocharova N. The astreinte in the Italian and Russian Administrative (Judicial) and Civil Proceedings, 3(3) Russian Law Journal (2015).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maleshin D. The Russian Style of Civil Procedure, 21 Emory International Law Review (2007).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maleshin D. The Russian Style of Civil Procedure, 21 Emory International Law Review (2007).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Osakwe C. The Public Interest and the Role of the Procurator in Soviet Civil Litigation: A Critical Analysis, 18 Texas International Law Journal (1983).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Osakwe C. The Public Interest and the Role of the Procurator in Soviet Civil Litigation: A Critical Analysis, 18 Texas International Law Journal (1983).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Quigley J. Socialist Law and the Civil Law Tradition, 37(4) American Journal of Comparative Law (1989).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Quigley J. Socialist Law and the Civil Law Tradition, 37(4) American Journal of Comparative Law (1989).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reshetnikova I. Judicial Reforms in Russia: 1864 to 2014, 3(2) Russian Law Journal (2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reshetnikova I. Judicial Reforms in Russia: 1864 to 2014, 3(2) Russian Law Journal (2015).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solomon P. Judicial Power in Russia: Through the Prism of Administrative Justice, 38(3) Law &amp; Society Review (2004).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solomon P. Judicial Power in Russia: Through the Prism of Administrative Justice, 38(3) Law &amp; Society Review (2004).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tumanov D. Public Interest and Administrative Legal Proceedings, 3(3) BRICS Law Journal (2016).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tumanov D. Public Interest and Administrative Legal Proceedings, 3(3) BRICS Law Journal (2016).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van der Pol R. &amp; Petrov A. Searching for Truth in Civil Process: The Netherlands and Russia, 3(1) Russian Law Journal (2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van der Pol R. &amp; Petrov A. Searching for Truth in Civil Process: The Netherlands and Russia, 3(1) Russian Law Journal (2015).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vyshinsky A. The Law of the Soviet State (New York: Macmillan, 1948).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vyshinsky A. The Law of the Soviet State (New York: Macmillan, 1948).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
