<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">bricslawjournal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">BRICS Law Journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Юридический журнал БРИКС</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2409-9058</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2412-2343</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Publishing House V.Ема</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21684/2412-2343-2014-1-1-59-65</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">bricslawjournal-7</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>COMMENTS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>SMALL CLAIM AND SUMMARY PROCEDURE IN CHINA</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>Yulin</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Yulin Fu (Beijing, China) – Professor of Peking University Law School</p><p>(316 Chen Ming Building of Peking University Law School, Haidian District, Beijing, 100871, China)</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">fuyulin65@126.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>Peking University</institution><country>China</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>81</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Fu Y., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Fu Y.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Fu Y.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/7">https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/7</self-uri><abstract><p>In MainlandChina, summary procedure is procedure applied at the first instance by basic-level courts and their detached tribunals. As simplified formal procedure, summary procedure can be classified into three types: 1) general / mandatory summary procedure, which is applied to cases with clear facts, unambiguous rights and obligations and minor disputes; 2) consensus procedure, which is applied to cases other than those to which mandatory summary procedure is applied, with the parties’ agreement on the application; 3) special summary procedure, which is ‘small claim procedure’ applied to cases involving amounts lower than 30 percent of the previous year’s average annual wages of workers in a given province and the judgment of the basic-level court or detached tribunal shall be final.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>civil procedure</kwd><kwd>small claim</kwd><kwd>small claim procedure</kwd><kwd>summary procedure</kwd><kwd>summary judgment</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Civil Justice in Crisis: Comparative Perspectives of Civil Procedure (Adrian A.S.Zuckerman, ed.) (Oxford University Press, 2005).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Civil Justice in Crisis: Comparative Perspectives of Civil Procedure (Adrian A.S.Zuckerman, ed.) (Oxford University Press, 2005).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fu, Yulin. Small Claims and Short-Cut Procedure, 5(3) Tsinghua Law Journal 46, 47 (2011).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fu, Yulin. Small Claims and Short-Cut Procedure, 5(3) Tsinghua Law Journal 46, 47 (2011).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Some Issues Concerning the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (discussed and adoptedat the 528th meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People’s Court, and promulgated by Judicial Interpretation No. 22 [1992] of the Supreme People’s Court on July 14, 1992), available at &lt;http://www.cietac.org/index/references/Laws/47607cb9b0f4987f001.cms&gt; (accessed Jan. 29, 2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Some Issues Concerning the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (discussed and adoptedat the 528th meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People’s Court, and promulgated by Judicial Interpretation No. 22 [1992] of the Supreme People’s Court on July 14, 1992), available at &lt;http://www.cietac.org/index/references/Laws/47607cb9b0f4987f001.cms&gt; (accessed Jan. 29, 2015).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Subrin, Stephen N., et al. Civil Procedure: Doctrine, Practice and Context (translation into Chinese) (Yulin Fu et al., trans.) (China University of Political Science and Law Press 2003).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Subrin, Stephen N., et al. Civil Procedure: Doctrine, Practice and Context (translation into Chinese) (Yulin Fu et al., trans.) (China University of Political Science and Law Press 2003).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Several Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of Summary Procedures in the Trial of Civil Cases (adopted at the 1280th meeting of the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People’s Court on July 4, 2003), Public Announcement No. 15 [2003] of the Supreme People’s Court, available at &lt;http://en.pkulaw.cn/ display.aspx?cgid=49521&amp;lib=law&gt; (accessed Jan. 29, 2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Several Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of Summary Procedures in the Trial of Civil Cases (adopted at the 1280th meeting of the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People’s Court on July 4, 2003), Public Announcement No. 15 [2003] of the Supreme People’s Court, available at &lt;http://en.pkulaw.cn/ display.aspx?cgid=49521&amp;lib=law&gt; (accessed Jan. 29, 2015).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yu, Fan. Studies on the Legal Procedure of Small Claims, 3 Social Sciences in China 141, 141–53 (2001).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yu, Fan. Studies on the Legal Procedure of Small Claims, 3 Social Sciences in China 141, 141–53 (2001).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zucker, Bruce, &amp; Herr, Monica. The People’s Court Examined: A Legal and Empirical Analysis of the Small Claims Court System, 37 U.S.F.L. Rev. 315, 317 (2003), available at http://lawblog.usfca.edu/lawreview/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/A223.pdf (accessed Jan. 29, 2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zucker, Bruce, &amp; Herr, Monica. The People’s Court Examined: A Legal and Empirical Analysis of the Small Claims Court System, 37 U.S.F.L. Rev. 315, 317 (2003), available at http://lawblog.usfca.edu/lawreview/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/A223.pdf (accessed Jan. 29, 2015).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
