bricslawjournalBRICS Law JournalЮридический журнал БРИКС2409-90582412-2343Publishing House V.Ема10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-4-62-75bricslawjournal-564Research ArticleARTICLEResearch into the Status of Special Administrative Regions in ChinaSymaniukN.

Nina Symaniuk – Associate Professor, Department of Theory, Methodology and Legal Support of State and Municipal Management, Graduated School of Economics and Management

19 Mira St., Yekaterinburg, 620002

n.v.symaniuk@urfu.ruTombergO.

Olga Tomberg – Professor, Department of Linguistics and Professional Communication in Foreign Languages

19 Mira St., Yekaterinburg, 620002

o.v.tomberg@urfu.ruZhangX.

Xiaowen Zhang – PhD Student

Shangda Rd., BaoShan District, Shanghai, 200444

haruka0127@126.comUral Federal UniversityRussian FederationShanghai UniversityChina202106122021846275Copyright © Symaniuk N., Tomberg O., Zhang X., 20212021Symaniuk N., Tomberg O., Zhang X.Symaniuk N., Tomberg O., Zhang X.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/564

This article analyzes the legal status of special administrative regions in China. This type of territorial unit occupies a special place and has a specific legal status, which is especially noticeable in relations with the central authorities. The authors focus on the historical prerequisites for the formation of such a legal status and analyze the current situation. A special feature of this study is the research methodology, since a comprehensive analysis requires the use of a mixed research method. The conclusions reached by the authors can be used to formulate a new form of government.

special administrative regionsgovernmentChinaexecutive powerlegislative powerjudiciaryThis article was prepared in the framework of the work on the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for young scientists No. MK-6113.2021.2 on the topic “The State Structure of Russia and China: Comparative Legal Research.”ReferencesCreswell J.W. & Plano Clark V.L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2<sup>nd</sup> ed. 2011).Creswell J.W. & Plano Clark V.L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2<sup>nd</sup> ed. 2011).Faure M. & Hartlief T. Economic Analysis in The Impact of Social Security Law on Tort Law 222 (Ulrich Magnus ed., 2003).Faure M. & Hartlief T. Economic Analysis in The Impact of Social Security Law on Tort Law 222 (Ulrich Magnus ed., 2003).Firth M. et al. Friend or Foe? The Role of State and Mutual Fund Ownership in the Split Share Structure Reform in China, 45(3) J. Fin. Quant. Anal. 685 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109010000190Firth M. et al. Friend or Foe? The Role of State and Mutual Fund Ownership in the Split Share Structure Reform in China, 45(3) J. Fin. Quant. Anal. 685 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109010000190Foucault M. The Subject and Power, 8(4) Crit. Inq. 777 (1982).Foucault M. The Subject and Power, 8(4) Crit. Inq. 777 (1982).Luney P.R., Jr. Traditions and Foreign Influences: Systems of Law in China an, 52(2) L. Contemp. Probl. 129 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/1191940Luney P.R., Jr. Traditions and Foreign Influences: Systems of Law in China an, 52(2) L. Contemp. Probl. 129 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/1191940Postiglione G.A. Education and Social Change in China: Inequality in a Market Economy (2006). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315704937Postiglione G.A. Education and Social Change in China: Inequality in a Market Economy (2006). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315704937

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.