bricslawjournalBRICS Law JournalЮридический журнал БРИКС2409-90582412-2343Publishing House V.Ема10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-4-31-37bricslawjournal-562Research ArticleARTICLEPossible Legal Cooperation for a BRICS Perspective on International and Transnational Economic LawSilvaE. M. D.

Emílio Mendonça Dias Silva – Professor of Post-Graduation in International Law, Escola Brasileira de Direito, Researcher, Centre for BRICS Studies (GEBRICS)

546 Rua Taquari, São Paulo, 03166-000

emiliomendoncads@gmail.comCamposB. R. S.

Bruce Roberto Scheidl Campos – Researcher, Centre for BRICS Studies (GEBRICS)

95 Largo São Francisco, São Paulo, 01005-010,

brucescheidl@gmail.comUniversity of São PauloBrazil202106122021843137Copyright © Silva E., Campos B., 20212021Silva E., Campos B.Silva E., Campos B.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/562

This research paper seeks to identify and analyze the regulations that rule the economic life of the BRICS countries in the fields of foreign investment’s law, competition law and global administrative law, and further to identify points of convergence and divergence among them in order to indicate the possibilities of legal cooperation to facilitate economic exchanges and investments flow among them. We believe that the possible bottlenecks in trade and investment can be overcome mostly by exchange of experiences, to mitigate the lack of knowledge on national laws and regulations, and by the creation of cooperative mechanisms that facilitate the economic flow among them.

foreign investment lawcompetition lawglobal administrative lawcooperationinternational lawReferencesBhasin N. & Manocha R. Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Promote FDI Inflows? Evidence from India, 41(4) Vikalpa 275 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090916666681Bhasin N. & Manocha R. Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Promote FDI Inflows? Evidence from India, 41(4) Vikalpa 275 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090916666681Costa J.A.F. Brasil e Arbitragem Internacional de Investimentos: Realidades e Possibilidades, 1(3) Revista Jurídica Luso Brasileira 875 (2015).Costa J.A.F. Brasil e Arbitragem Internacional de Investimentos: Realidades e Possibilidades, 1(3) Revista Jurídica Luso Brasileira 875 (2015).Elkemann C. & Ruppel O.C. Chinese Foreign Direct Investment into Africa in the Context of BRICS and Sino-African Bilateral Investment Treaties, 13(4) Rich. J. Global L. & Bus. 593 (2015).Elkemann C. & Ruppel O.C. Chinese Foreign Direct Investment into Africa in the Context of BRICS and Sino-African Bilateral Investment Treaties, 13(4) Rich. J. Global L. & Bus. 593 (2015).Kingsbury B. et al. A Emergência de um Direito Administrativo Global in Ensaios sobre o Direito Administrativo Global e Sua Aplicação no Brasil 11 (Michelle Ratton Sanchez Badin (org.), 2016).Kingsbury B. et al. A Emergência de um Direito Administrativo Global in Ensaios sobre o Direito Administrativo Global e Sua Aplicação no Brasil 11 (Michelle Ratton Sanchez Badin (org.), 2016).Liu M. The New Chinese Foreign Investment Law and its Implication on Foreign Investor, 38(2) Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 288 (2018).Liu M. The New Chinese Foreign Investment Law and its Implication on Foreign Investor, 38(2) Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 288 (2018).Mendonça E.D.S. Foreign Investments Protection and Arbitration Within BRICS in International Legal Aspects of BRICS 289 (Paulo Borba Casella et al. eds., 2019).Mendonça E.D.S. Foreign Investments Protection and Arbitration Within BRICS in International Legal Aspects of BRICS 289 (Paulo Borba Casella et al. eds., 2019).Stoleson M.A. Investment at an Impasse: Russia’s Production-Sharing Agreement Law and the Continuing Barriers to Petroleum Investment in Russia, 7(2) Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L. 671 (1997).Stoleson M.A. Investment at an Impasse: Russia’s Production-Sharing Agreement Law and the Continuing Barriers to Petroleum Investment in Russia, 7(2) Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L. 671 (1997).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.