bricslawjournalBRICS Law JournalЮридический журнал БРИКС2409-90582412-2343Publishing House V.Ема10.21684/2412-2343-2016-3-1-66-89bricslawjournal-33Research ArticleARTICLETOWARDS FULFILLMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RULES OF HUMANITARIAN LAW IN THE CONTEXT OF THE NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATYBagheriS.

Saeed Bagheri (Antalya,Turkey) - Assistant Professor at Department of International Law

(Dumlupinar blvd., Campus, 07058,Antalya,Turkey)

sbagheri@akdeniz.edu.trAkdeniz University, AntalyaTurkey201627062016316689Copyright © Bagheri s., 20162016Bagheri s.Bagheri s.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/33

The Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is an international treaty that should be implemented during both peace and wartime. However, the obligations included in the treaty are dependent upon states' attitudes regarding other issues. Non-use of nuclear weapons is directly related to negotiations done for the purpose of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, non-production or accumulation by other means and disarmament. In our day, prevention of the proliferation of nuclear weapons has been one of the issues of international law.

The present study is of crucial significance due to its endeavor to clarify the general principles of Humanitarian Law in a relationship to the threat of nuclear weapons' up to now, a special norm; significantly limiting or completely prohibiting the use of nuclear weapons, has not been accepted in international law. However, customary international humanitarian law regarding the use of nuclear weapons holds great value because of its purpose in eliminating nuclear weapons as a means of war through ascertaining their non-use and also appeasing the importance of nuclear ascendancy. In this respect, the NPT regime and its relationship with international humanitarian law will be discussed. Firstly, the NPT background, formation, main objectives and principles will be analyzed. In order to evaluate the relationship between the NPT and humanitarian law, the humanitarian obligations in general, humanitarian obligations in the context of the NPT and fulfillmen t of these obligations under the NPT should be studied. One of the main parts of the study is nuclear disarmament obligation included in the NPT. In this section, nuclear disarmament obligation in the context of the NPT and the legal framework of possible, general and comprehensive disarmament will be examined.

nuclear weaponsnon-proliferation treatyNPTnuclear disarmamentinternational lawinternational humanitarian lawReferencesAllison, Graham, The Cuban Missile Crisis at 50Lessons for U.S. Foreign Policy Today, 91(4) Foreign Aff. (2012).Allison, Graham, The Cuban Missile Crisis at 50Lessons for U.S. Foreign Policy Today, 91(4) Foreign Aff. (2012).Berry, Ken et al., (eds.), Delegitimizing Nuclear Weapons Examining: The Validity of Nuclear Deterrence (Monterey, United States 2010).Berry, Ken et al., (eds.), Delegitimizing Nuclear Weapons Examining: The Validity of Nuclear Deterrence (Monterey, United States 2010).Bilder, Richard, Nuclear Weapons and International Law, in Nuclear Weapons and Law Arthur 4 (Selvyn and Martin Feinriders, eds.,Westport 1984).Bilder, Richard, Nuclear Weapons and International Law, in Nuclear Weapons and Law Arthur 4 (Selvyn and Martin Feinriders, eds.,Westport 1984).Caldwell, Dan & Williams, Robert E. JR., Seeking Security in an Insecure World (Lanham, Maryland 2012).Caldwell, Dan & Williams, Robert E. JR., Seeking Security in an Insecure World (Lanham, Maryland 2012).Fischer, David, History of the International Atomic Energy Agency: The First Forty Years (Vienna 1997).Fischer, David, History of the International Atomic Energy Agency: The First Forty Years (Vienna 1997).Ford, Christopher A., Debating Disarmament: Interpreting Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, 14(3) Non-proliferation Rev. (2007). DOI: 10.1080/10736700701611720.Ford, Christopher A., Debating Disarmament: Interpreting Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, 14(3) Non-proliferation Rev. (2007). DOI: 10.1080/10736700701611720.Feinrider, Martin, Martin Feinrider, International Law as Law of the Land: Another Constitutional Constraint on Use of Nuclear Weapons, 7 Nova L. J. (1982).Feinrider, Martin, Martin Feinrider, International Law as Law of the Land: Another Constitutional Constraint on Use of Nuclear Weapons, 7 Nova L. J. (1982).Lee, Robert E., Technology's Child: Schwarzkopf and Operation Desert Storm, in Command Concepts: A Theory Derived from the Practice of Command and Control (CarlLee, Robert E., Technology's Child: Schwarzkopf and Operation Desert Storm, in Command Concepts: A Theory Derived from the Practice of Command and Control (CarlH.Builder, Steven C. Bankes & Richard Nordin eds., California 1999).H.Builder, Steven C. Bankes & Richard Nordin eds., California 1999).Meyrowitz, Elliot L., The Laws of War and Nuclear Weapons, 9(2) Brooklyn J. of Int'l L. (1993).Meyrowitz, Elliot L., The Laws of War and Nuclear Weapons, 9(2) Brooklyn J. of Int'l L. (1993).Moxley JR., Charles J., Burroughs, John and Granoff, Jonathan, Nuclear Weapons and Compliance with International Humanitarian Law and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, 34(595) Fordham Int'l L. J. (2011).Moxley JR., Charles J., Burroughs, John and Granoff, Jonathan, Nuclear Weapons and Compliance with International Humanitarian Law and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, 34(595) Fordham Int'l L. J. (2011).Thakur, Ramesh, Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament: Can the Power of Ideas Tame the Power of the State?, 13(1) Int'l Stud. Rev. (2011). DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00996.x.Thakur, Ramesh, Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament: Can the Power of Ideas Tame the Power of the State?, 13(1) Int'l Stud. Rev. (2011). DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00996.x.Weeramantry, Christopher G., Good Faith Negotiations Leading to the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons: Request for an Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice (Harvard 2009).Weeramantry, Christopher G., Good Faith Negotiations Leading to the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons: Request for an Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice (Harvard 2009).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.