<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">bricslawjournal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">BRICS Law Journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Юридический журнал БРИКС</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2409-9058</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2412-2343</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Publishing House V.Ема</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21684/2412-2343-2016-3-1-7-33</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">bricslawjournal-30</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARTICLE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>GENERAL APPROACHES TO DOMINANT MARKET POSITION, PROHIBITION OF ABUSE OF MARKET POWER, AND MARKET STRUCTURE CONTROL WITHIN THE BRICS COUNTRIES</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Belikova</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ksenia Belikova (Moscow, Russia) - Professor, Department of Civil and Labor Law</p><p>(6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., 117198, Moscow, Russia)</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">Belikovaksenia@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="en">Peoples' Friendship University of Russia<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>7</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Belikova K., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Belikova K.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Belikova K.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/30">https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/30</self-uri><abstract><p>The article presents research on the general approaches taken by BRICS countries through their legislation and legal orders to counteract anticompetitive market strategies such as abuse of dominant market power and market structure control, as a means of both global and regional governance in the legal orders ofChina,India,Russia, andSouth Africa. The author pays particular attention to current legislation of the BRICS countries in the field of competition protection with regard to provisions related to (1) the criteria for establishment of a dominant market position and (2) market structure control and restriction of anticompetitive mergers &amp; acquisitions, and 'concentration' of enterprises' market power control fixed by Asian (China and India), Euro-Asian (Russia), and African (South Africa) legal orders and prohibition of abuse of market power. The article argues that our society is interested in the engagement of the population in trade and industrial activity. This is the general rule. Nowadays, however, this rule allows exceptions: restrictions on freedom of trade can be justified by exceptional circumstances in certain cases and under certain circumstances (e.g. an exemption necessary in the interest of security of the state or public interest). The analysis of substantial contents of the laws on competition and monopolies of the abovementioned BRICS countries and relevant case law shows the existence of a number of conventional, generally acknowledged (unified) provisions and norms. At the same time, there are specific features that make them different. These generally acknowledged provisions and peculiarities are a focus of the article.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>BRICS</kwd><kwd>protection of competition</kwd><kwd>restrictive business practices</kwd><kwd>market power</kwd><kwd>dominan t market position</kwd><kwd>abuse of market power</kwd><kwd>prohibition of abuse of market power</kwd><kwd>market structure control</kwd><kwd>mergers &amp; acquisitions</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Belikova K. La protección jurídica de la competencia en MERCOSUR, 26 BlC 59-73 (2010).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belikova K. La protección jurídica de la competencia en MERCOSUR, 26 BlC 59-73 (2010).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Figari H., Gomez H., Zuniga M. Hacia una metodología para la definición del Mercado relevante y la determinación de la existencia de posición del dominio, 2 rCPi (2005).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Figari H., Gomez H., Zuniga M. Hacia una metodología para la definición del Mercado relevante y la determinación de la existencia de posición del dominio, 2 rCPi (2005).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">John l. Engaging BRICS. Challenges and Opportunities for Civil Society, 12 OIWPS (2012).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">John l. Engaging BRICS. Challenges and Opportunities for Civil Society, 12 OIWPS (2012).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O’Neil J., Stupnytska A. The Long-Term Outlook for the BRICs and N-11 Post Crisis, 192 Goldman Sachs Global Econ. Paper (2009).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O’Neil J., Stupnytska A. The Long-Term Outlook for the BRICs and N-11 Post Crisis, 192 Goldman Sachs Global Econ. Paper (2009).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ugarte F.S., The Int’l Competition Network: Achievements So Far, 22(10) int’l Fin. l. rev (2003).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ugarte F.S., The Int’l Competition Network: Achievements So Far, 22(10) int’l Fin. l. rev (2003).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Whish R., Sufrin B. Competition Law (2d ed. Butterworths, London 1993).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Whish R., Sufrin B. Competition Law (2d ed. Butterworths, London 1993).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang B. Chinese competition policy, 22 BLC (2006).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yang B. Chinese competition policy, 22 BLC (2006).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Беликова К.М. Злоупотребление доминирующим положением в законода¬тельстве, доктрине и правоприменительной практике Европейского Союза и стран Южноамериканского общего рынка - Аргентины, Бразилии и Перу, 7(79) Право и политика (2006) [Belikova К.М. Zloupotreblenie dominirujushhim polozhe- niem v zakonodatel'stve, doktrine i pravoprimenitel'noj praktike Evropejskogo Sojuza i stran Juzhnoamerikanskogo obshhego rynka - Argentiny, Brazilii i Peru, 7(79) Pravo i politika (2006) [Belikova К.М. Abuse of a dominant position in the legislation, doc¬trine and practice of the European Union and the countries of the southern common market - Argentina, Brazil and Peru, 7(79) law and politics (2006)]].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Беликова К.М. Злоупотребление доминирующим положением в законода¬тельстве, доктрине и правоприменительной практике Европейского Союза и стран Южноамериканского общего рынка - Аргентины, Бразилии и Перу, 7(79) Право и политика (2006) [Belikova К.М. Zloupotreblenie dominirujushhim polozhe- niem v zakonodatel'stve, doktrine i pravoprimenitel'noj praktike Evropejskogo Sojuza i stran Juzhnoamerikanskogo obshhego rynka - Argentiny, Brazilii i Peru, 7(79) Pravo i politika (2006) [Belikova К.М. Abuse of a dominant position in the legislation, doc¬trine and practice of the European Union and the countries of the southern common market - Argentina, Brazil and Peru, 7(79) law and politics (2006)]].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
