bricslawjournalBRICS Law JournalЮридический журнал БРИКС2409-90582412-2343Publishing House V.Ема10.21684/2412-2343-2026-13-2-64-95bricslawjournal-1753Research ArticleARTICLEArbitration in the BRICS+ Era: Harmonization, Institutional Practice, and Judicial Enforcement in Brazilhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0504-1154FerreiraD. B.

Daniel Brantes Ferreira – Inpedendent Researcher, Founding Partner

300 Avenida Raymundo Magalhães Jr, bloco 3, Apartment 208, Rio de Janeiro – RJ, 22793-050

daniel@dbflaw.com.brhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6655-8953GromovaE. A.

Elizaveta A. Gromova – Professor, Department of Civil Law and Civil Procedure

149 Kommuny St., Chelyabinsk, 454092

gromovaea@susu.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9096-6487De FariasB. O.

Bianca Oliveira de Farias – Academic Director

Rua Dom Manuel, nº 25, Centro, Rio de Janeiro – RJ, 20010-090

profbianca@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-4987-2793LeowT.

Terrence Leow – Senior Partner

Room 1, 2702-2706 Dongjun Sq., 836 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510080

terrence@whoboundlaw.comDBFLawBrazilSouth Ural State University (National Research University)Russian FederationSchool for Judges of the State of Rio de Janeiro – EMERJBrazilGuangdong WhoBound Law FirmChina2026010720261326495Copyright © Ferreira D.B., Gromova E.A., de Farias B.O., Leow T., 20262026Ferreira D.B., Gromova E.A., de Farias B.O., Leow T.Ferreira D.B., Gromova E.A., de Farias B.O., Leow T.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/1753

The expansion of BRICS into BRICS+ has transformed the bloc into a significant actor in global trade and dispute resolution. This article provides the first comprehensive examination of arbitration practices within the BRICS+ framework, combining doctrinal analysis, comparative legal study, and empirical research. It maps the treaty commitments, legislative frameworks, and institutional preferences of BRICS+ jurisdictions. It analyzes over a decade of case law from Brazil’s Superior Court of Justice (2014–2025) concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. The findings reveal uneven alignment with the New York Convention, persistent divergences in public policy standards, and notable asymmetries in institutional participation – particularly China’s dominance and Africa’s limited engagement. However, recognition decisions remain overwhelmingly supportive of enforcement, indicating a trend toward convergence. By situating these dynamics within broader debates on regionalization, judicial control, and Global South arbitration initiatives, this study provides new empirical evidence and theoretical insights into how emerging powers are reshaping transnational dispute resolution, offering policy-relevant recommendations to enhance cooperation and harmonize arbitration practices across the BRICS+ landscape.

BRICS+international commercial arbitrationforeign arbitral award recognitionpublic policy exceptionregional dispute resolutionReferencesBaboolal Frank, R. (2024). The future of ADR within the developing and expanding BRICS. In R. Baboolal Frank (Ed.), Dispute resolution within Africa: A journey forward (pp. 141–146). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76261-1_10Baboolal Frank, R. (2024). The future of ADR within the developing and expanding BRICS. In R. Baboolal Frank (Ed.), Dispute resolution within Africa: A journey forward (pp. 141–146). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76261-1_10Barkett, J. M., & Paulsson, J. (2009). The myth of culture clash in international commercial arbitration. Florida International University Law Review, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.25148/lawrev.5.1.5Barkett, J. M., & Paulsson, J. (2009). The myth of culture clash in international commercial arbitration. Florida International University Law Review, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.25148/lawrev.5.1.5Born, G. (2020). International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International.Born, G. (2020). International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International.Bray, D., & Bray, H. L. (2014). International arbitration and public policy. Juris Publishing.Bray, D., & Bray, H. L. (2014). International arbitration and public policy. Juris Publishing.Cordero-Moss, G. (2024). Delocalization and re-localization in commercial law and the law of arbitration. In J. Allen & G. Dannemann (Eds.), F.A. Mann: The lawyer and his legacy (pp. 179–202). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198881452.003.0008Cordero-Moss, G. (2024). Delocalization and re-localization in commercial law and the law of arbitration. In J. Allen & G. Dannemann (Eds.), F.A. Mann: The lawyer and his legacy (pp. 179–202). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198881452.003.0008Cremades, B. M. (1998). Overcoming the clash of legal cultures: The role of interactive arbitration. Arbitration International, 14(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/14.2.157Cremades, B. M. (1998). Overcoming the clash of legal cultures: The role of interactive arbitration. Arbitration International, 14(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/14.2.157Curtin, K. M. (1997). Redefining public policy in international arbitration of mandatory national laws. Defence Counsel Journal, 64(2), 271–284.Curtin, K. M. (1997). Redefining public policy in international arbitration of mandatory national laws. Defence Counsel Journal, 64(2), 271–284.De Barros, V. C. M. (2017). Exceção de ordem pública na homologação de sentença arbitral estrangeira no Brasil. Quartier Latin. (In Portuguese).De Barros, V. C. M. (2017). Exceção de ordem pública na homologação de sentença arbitral estrangeira no Brasil. Quartier Latin. (In Portuguese).Drahozal, C. R. (2006). Arbitration by the numbers: The state of empirical research on international commercial arbitration. Arbitration International, 22(2), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/22.2.291Drahozal, C. R. (2006). Arbitration by the numbers: The state of empirical research on international commercial arbitration. Arbitration International, 22(2), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/22.2.291Fatima, N. (2022). Future of dispute resolution and investment in BRICS. Brazilian Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 4, 187–209. https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v4i8.9Fatima, N. (2022). Future of dispute resolution and investment in BRICS. Brazilian Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 4, 187–209. https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v4i8.9Ferreira, D. B., & Giovannini, C. J. G. J. (2020). Multi-tier and hybrid dispute resolution clauses as a solution for times of uncertainty: Some comparative law experiences. Rev Eletrônica Dir Newton Paiva, 42, 366. (In Portuguese).Ferreira, D. B., & Giovannini, C. J. G. J. (2020). Multi-tier and hybrid dispute resolution clauses as a solution for times of uncertainty: Some comparative law experiences. Rev Eletrônica Dir Newton Paiva, 42, 366. (In Portuguese).Ferreira, D. B., & Gromova, E. A. (2024). Digital evidence: The admissibility of leaked and hacked evidence in arbitration proceedings. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 37(3), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10014-1Ferreira, D. B., & Gromova, E. A. (2024). Digital evidence: The admissibility of leaked and hacked evidence in arbitration proceedings. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 37(3), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10014-1Fouchard, P., & Goldman, B. (1999). Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law International.Fouchard, P., & Goldman, B. (1999). Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law International.Gromova, E. A. (2025). Creation of the BRICS+ arbitration institution: Problems and prospects. Herald of Civil Procedure, 15(1), 203–215. (In Russian).Gromova, E. A. (2025). Creation of the BRICS+ arbitration institution: Problems and prospects. Herald of Civil Procedure, 15(1), 203–215. (In Russian).Gu, W. (2005). Recourse against arbitral awards: How far can a court go? Supportive and supervisory role of Hong Kong courts as lessons to mainland China arbitration. Chinese Journal of International Law, 4(2), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmi026Gu, W. (2005). Recourse against arbitral awards: How far can a court go? Supportive and supervisory role of Hong Kong courts as lessons to mainland China arbitration. Chinese Journal of International Law, 4(2), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmi026Kleinheisterkamp, J. (2023). The myth of transnational public policy in international arbitration. American Journal of Comparative Law, 71(1), 98–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avad021Kleinheisterkamp, J. (2023). The myth of transnational public policy in international arbitration. American Journal of Comparative Law, 71(1), 98–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avad021Lew, J. D. M., & Mistelis, L. A. (2003). Comparative international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law International.Lew, J. D. M., & Mistelis, L. A. (2003). Comparative international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law International.Linh, T. H. T. (2025). Commercial arbitration in Asia: Legal developments and regional dynamics from an ASEAN perspective. Asia Pacific Law Review, 33(2), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2024.2445627Linh, T. H. T. (2025). Commercial arbitration in Asia: Legal developments and regional dynamics from an ASEAN perspective. Asia Pacific Law Review, 33(2), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2024.2445627Mason, P. E. (2021). The Singapore convention and its benefits for Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 2(4), 181–193. (In Portuguese).Mason, P. E. (2021). The Singapore convention and its benefits for Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 2(4), 181–193. (In Portuguese).Mayer, P. (2006). Effect of international public policy in international arbitration. In J. D. M. Lew & L. A. Mistelis (Eds.), Pervasive problems in international arbitration (p. 61–69). Kluwer Law International.Mayer, P. (2006). Effect of international public policy in international arbitration. In J. D. M. Lew & L. A. Mistelis (Eds.), Pervasive problems in international arbitration (p. 61–69). Kluwer Law International.Murphy, S. D. (2022). Temporal issues relating to BIT dispute resolution. ICSID Review—Foreign Investment Law Journal, 37(1-2), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siab030Murphy, S. D. (2022). Temporal issues relating to BIT dispute resolution. ICSID Review—Foreign Investment Law Journal, 37(1-2), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siab030Nottage, L., & Ubilava, A. (2018). Asia’s changing international investment regime: Sustainability, regionalization and arbitration. University of Western Australia Law Review, 44(2), Paper No. 18/34.Nottage, L., & Ubilava, A. (2018). Asia’s changing international investment regime: Sustainability, regionalization and arbitration. University of Western Australia Law Review, 44(2), Paper No. 18/34.O’Neill, J. (2001). Building better global economic BRICs. Goldman Sachs. https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/build-better-brics.pdfO’Neill, J. (2001). Building better global economic BRICs. Goldman Sachs. https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/build-better-brics.pdfSchmidt, G. D. R., Ferreira, D. B., & Oliveira, R. C. R. (2021). Comentários à Lei de Arbitragem. Editora Método. (In Portuguese).Schmidt, G. D. R., Ferreira, D. B., & Oliveira, R. C. R. (2021). Comentários à Lei de Arbitragem. Editora Método. (In Portuguese).Simões, F. D. (2017). A dispute resolution centre for the BRICS? In R. J. Neuwirth, A. Svetlicinii & D. De Castro Halis (Eds.), The BRICS-lawyers’ guide to global cooperation (pp. 270–286). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108236102.014Simões, F. D. (2017). A dispute resolution centre for the BRICS? In R. J. Neuwirth, A. Svetlicinii & D. De Castro Halis (Eds.), The BRICS-lawyers’ guide to global cooperation (pp. 270–286). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108236102.014Skvortsov, O. Y. (2023). About BRICS investment arbitration. Eurasian Integration: Economic, Law, Policy, 17(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-01-89-97. (In Russian).Skvortsov, O. Y. (2023). About BRICS investment arbitration. Eurasian Integration: Economic, Law, Policy, 17(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-01-89-97. (In Russian).Tweeddale, K., Tweeddale, A., & Nguyen, N. (2014). Section 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996—when fact and law collide. Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 80(2), 136–146.Tweeddale, K., Tweeddale, A., & Nguyen, N. (2014). Section 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996—when fact and law collide. Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 80(2), 136–146.UNCITRAL Secretariat. (2017). Guide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: New York, 1958. Brill Nijhoff.UNCITRAL Secretariat. (2017). Guide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: New York, 1958. Brill Nijhoff.Van den Berg, A. J. (2008). The New York Convention of 1958: An overview. In E. Gaillard & D. Di Pietro (Eds.), Enforcement of arbitration agreements and international arbitral awards: The New York Convention in Practice (pp. 39–68). Cameron May.Van den Berg, A. J. (2008). The New York Convention of 1958: An overview. In E. Gaillard & D. Di Pietro (Eds.), Enforcement of arbitration agreements and international arbitral awards: The New York Convention in Practice (pp. 39–68). Cameron May.Zhang, M. (2018). Enforceability: Foreign arbitral awards in Chinese courts. San Diego International Law Journal, 20, 1.Zhang, M. (2018). Enforceability: Foreign arbitral awards in Chinese courts. San Diego International Law Journal, 20, 1.Zhang, S. (2023). Public policy in international arbitration law. In S. Zhang, The public policy exception in the judicial review of international commercial arbitral awards: Lessons from and for China (pp. 15–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67679-0_2Zhang, S. (2023). Public policy in international arbitration law. In S. Zhang, The public policy exception in the judicial review of international commercial arbitral awards: Lessons from and for China (pp. 15–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67679-0_2

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.