bricslawjournalBRICS Law JournalЮридический журнал БРИКС2409-90582412-2343Publishing House V.Ема10.21684/2412-2343-2026-13-1-107-125bricslawjournal-1575Research ArticleARTICLEArbitration in Russia: Current Problems and Solutionshttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-2137-0645KudryavtsevaE. V.

Elena V. Kudryavtseva – Professor, Department of Civil Procedure, Law Faculty

1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991

evkud@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2148-5273KurochkinS. A.

Sergey A. Kurochkin – Associate Professor, Department of International Law

21 Komsomolskaya St., Yekaterinburg, 620137

s.a.kurochkin@mail.ruLomonosov Moscow State UniversityRussian FederationUral State Law University named after V.F. YakovlevRussian Federation202608042026131107125Copyright © Kudryavtseva E.V., Kurochkin S.A., 20262026Kudryavtseva E.V., Kurochkin S.A.Kudryavtseva E.V., Kurochkin S.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/1575

The development of arbitration as a means of resolving legal conflicts inevitably gives rise to various systemic challenges. Legislators and law enforcement officers in different countries encounter difficulties in integrating arbitration into the system of civil jurisdiction due to national peculiarities and legal traditions. This article provides an analytical overview of the main problems in the field of arbitration in Russia, including the application of current legislation and doctrinal developments in this area. Special attention is paid to issues of cross-cutting, system-building significance, such as the organization and administration of arbitration in Russia, the arbitrability of disputes, arbitration agreements, compliance with due process requirements, as well as the introduction of digital technologies in arbitration. Based on the results of the analysis, potential solutions for addressing the topical issues in the field of Russian arbitration are proposed.

arbitrationarbitration institutionsad hoc arbitrationarbitration agreementindependence and impartialityarbitrabilityartificial intelligenceReferencesAfanasiev, S. F. (2023). To the question of the use of artificial intelligence in the legal field. Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Law, 1, 263–268. https://doi.org/10.17308/law/1995-5502/2023/1/263-268. (In Russian).Afanasiev, S. F. (2023). To the question of the use of artificial intelligence in the legal field. Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Law, 1, 263–268. https://doi.org/10.17308/law/1995-5502/2023/1/263-268. (In Russian).Anurov, V. N. (2023). Conditional arbitrability of disputes on the recognition of ownership of immovable property. Arbitration Court, 1/2, 69–83. (In Russian).Anurov, V. N. (2023). Conditional arbitrability of disputes on the recognition of ownership of immovable property. Arbitration Court, 1/2, 69–83. (In Russian).Belov, V. A. (2024). The legal nature of the arbitration agreement. Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation, 6, 28–69. https://doi.org/10.37239/2500-2643-2024-19-6-28-69. (In Russian).Belov, V. A. (2024). The legal nature of the arbitration agreement. Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation, 6, 28–69. https://doi.org/10.37239/2500-2643-2024-19-6-28-69. (In Russian).Belov, V. A., & Skvortsov, O. Y. (2025). Civil justice and arbitration: Discussion. Law, 6, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.37239/0869-4400-2025-22-6-107-121. (In Russian).Belov, V. A., & Skvortsov, O. Y. (2025). Civil justice and arbitration: Discussion. Law, 6, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.37239/0869-4400-2025-22-6-107-121. (In Russian).Belyaeva, O. A., & Gabov, A. V. (2017). Arbitrability of disputes arising in the field of procurement. Journal of Russian Law, 5, 46–55. (In Russian).Belyaeva, O. A., & Gabov, A. V. (2017). Arbitrability of disputes arising in the field of procurement. Journal of Russian Law, 5, 46–55. (In Russian).Born, G. (2020). International arbitration: Law and practice. Russian Institute of Modern Arbitration. (In Russian).Born, G. (2020). International arbitration: Law and practice. Russian Institute of Modern Arbitration. (In Russian).Eremin, V. V. (2021). The arbitrability of disputes involving public entities (PhD Thesis). St. Petersburg State University. (In Russian).Eremin, V. V. (2021). The arbitrability of disputes involving public entities (PhD Thesis). St. Petersburg State University. (In Russian).Ilyichev, P. A. (2021). On the expediency of reforming the ad hoc arbitration system in Russia. Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 7, 13–17. (In Russian).Ilyichev, P. A. (2021). On the expediency of reforming the ad hoc arbitration system in Russia. Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 7, 13–17. (In Russian).Isaenkova, O. V. (2020). On the possible impact of the robotization of justice on the operation of certain principles of justice in civil proceedings. Problems of Civil Law and Procedure, 5, 224–230. (In Russian).Isaenkova, O. V. (2020). On the possible impact of the robotization of justice on the operation of certain principles of justice in civil proceedings. Problems of Civil Law and Procedure, 5, 224–230. (In Russian).Makolkin, N. N. (2023). The potential of digital transformation of arbitration. Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 4, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-20234-27-30. (In Russian).Makolkin, N. N. (2023). The potential of digital transformation of arbitration. Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 4, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-20234-27-30. (In Russian).Minina, A. I. (2014). Arbitrability: Theory and practice of international commercial arbitration. Infotropic Media. (In Russian).Minina, A. I. (2014). Arbitrability: Theory and practice of international commercial arbitration. Infotropic Media. (In Russian).Morozov, M. E. (2020). Ad hoc arbitration procedure and hidden administration. Arbitration Court, 1/2, 286–295. (In Russian).Morozov, M. E. (2020). Ad hoc arbitration procedure and hidden administration. Arbitration Court, 1/2, 286–295. (In Russian).Pechegina, P. D., Dyakonova, M. O., & Sinitsyn, S. S. (2024). Public order: Towards the problem of institutionalization in international civil procedure. International Public and Private Law, 1, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3910-2024-1-21-25. (In Russian).Pechegina, P. D., Dyakonova, M. O., & Sinitsyn, S. S. (2024). Public order: Towards the problem of institutionalization in international civil procedure. International Public and Private Law, 1, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3910-2024-1-21-25. (In Russian).Reshetnikova, I. V. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the commercial procedure: Possible applications. Herald of Civil Procedure, 2, 30–41. (In Russian).Reshetnikova, I. V. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the commercial procedure: Possible applications. Herald of Civil Procedure, 2, 30–41. (In Russian).Sevastyanov, G. V. (2015). The legal nature of arbitration as an institution of alternative dispute resolution (private procedural law). Editorial board of the journal “Arbitration Court.” (In Russian).Sevastyanov, G. V. (2015). The legal nature of arbitration as an institution of alternative dispute resolution (private procedural law). Editorial board of the journal “Arbitration Court.” (In Russian).Sevastyanov, G. V. (2023). The constitutional model of arbitrability of disputes on immovable property or the replacement of formal legal control when issuing a writ of execution by investigating the circumstances of an arbitral award— “sudoisation” of arbitration? Arbitration Court, 3/4, 49–64. (In Russian).Sevastyanov, G. V. (2023). The constitutional model of arbitrability of disputes on immovable property or the replacement of formal legal control when issuing a writ of execution by investigating the circumstances of an arbitral award— “sudoisation” of arbitration? Arbitration Court, 3/4, 49–64. (In Russian).Skvortsov, O. Y. (2018). Arbitrability of procurement disputes: The struggle between the classical civil approach and the theory of “accumulation of the public element.” Arbitration Court, 1/2, 130–131. (In Russian).Skvortsov, O. Y. (2018). Arbitrability of procurement disputes: The struggle between the classical civil approach and the theory of “accumulation of the public element.” Arbitration Court, 1/2, 130–131. (In Russian).Skvortsov, O. Y. (2023). The Constitutional Court: The ideology of practice concerning arbitration. Arbitration Court, 1/2, 68. (In Russian).Skvortsov, O. Y. (2023). The Constitutional Court: The ideology of practice concerning arbitration. Arbitration Court, 1/2, 68. (In Russian).Skvortsov, O. Y. (2024). Lex facit arbitrum? Philosophical and legal notes on arbitration. Journal of Russian Law, 11, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.61205/s160565900030821-7. (In Russian).Skvortsov, O. Y. (2024). Lex facit arbitrum? Philosophical and legal notes on arbitration. Journal of Russian Law, 11, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.61205/s160565900030821-7. (In Russian).Skvortsov, O. Y., Savransky, M. Y., & Sevastyanov, G. V. (Eds.). (2025). International commercial arbitration (3rd ed.). Editorial board of the journal “Arbitration Court.” (In Russian).Skvortsov, O. Y., Savransky, M. Y., & Sevastyanov, G. V. (Eds.). (2025). International commercial arbitration (3rd ed.). Editorial board of the journal “Arbitration Court.” (In Russian).Trezubov, E. S. (2024). Are hidden administration and the ad hoc arbitrator’s system activity identical concepts? Arbitration Court, 1/2, 76. (In Russian).Trezubov, E. S. (2024). Are hidden administration and the ad hoc arbitrator’s system activity identical concepts? Arbitration Court, 1/2, 76. (In Russian).Tuktamyshev, V. D. (2025). The competence of the arbitral tribunal: General characteristics and arbitrability of disputes. Statut. (In Russian).Tuktamyshev, V. D. (2025). The competence of the arbitral tribunal: General characteristics and arbitrability of disputes. Statut. (In Russian).Van den Berg, A. (1981). The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958: Towards a uniform judicial interpretation. Kluwer Law and Taxation.Van den Berg, A. (1981). The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958: Towards a uniform judicial interpretation. Kluwer Law and Taxation.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.