<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">bricslawjournal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">BRICS Law Journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Юридический журнал БРИКС</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2409-9058</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2412-2343</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Publishing House V.Ема</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21684/2412-2343-2018-5-2-24-48</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">bricslawjournal-151</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARTICLE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>THE RANGE OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE SPECIALIZATIONS IN RUSSIA AND THE OTHER BRICS COUNTRIES</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kleandrov</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Mikhail Kleandrov) - Corresponding Member, Russian Academy of Sciences, Senior Researcher, institute of State and Law, Former Judge of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation</p><p>11-2 Kutuzova St., Moscow, 121354</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">mklean@ksrf.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Pluzhnik</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Irina Pluzhnik (Tyumen, Russia) - Professor, Head of the Department of Foreign Languages and intercultural Professional Communication for Law and Economics </p><p>38 Lenina St., Tyumen, 625000</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">irinapluzhnik@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>Russian Academy of Sciences</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-2"><institution>Tyumen State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>07</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>24</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Kleandrov M., Pluzhnik I., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Kleandrov M., Pluzhnik I.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kleandrov M., Pluzhnik I.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/151">https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/151</self-uri><abstract><p>This article deals with the challenges concerning increasing administrative justice efficacy in Russia and other BRICS countries, where the specialized development of jurisdictional bodies is inconsistent and far from effective. The article analyzes the gaps and disputed aspects of administrative justice including the mechanisms for judicial administrative dispute resolution in the BRICS countries. The authors argue that the level of effectiveness of administrative justice vested in judicial procedures depends critically on the specialization of the administrative courts. This involves individual judges, separately operating permanent judges, judicial committees, mono-courts, independent administrative judicial systems incorporated into larger judicial systems within the courts of general jurisdiction, and separate and independent administrative and judicial systems. Even though the BRICS countries do not have a structured administrative judiciary, the retrospective and comparative analysis of their administrative justice jurisdiction and its most effective practices and mechanisms undertaken by the authors enables them to rethink the existing approach to resolving administrative cases via the judiciary. The aim of the article is to initiate the creation of an independent administrative court system organization in order to ensure better justice in the areas of social life including legal relations with executive bodies. Suggestions for the implementation of the specialization of the administrative judiciary in the Russian Federation are given. The authors, for the first time in Russian jurisprudence, propose a theoretical model of an independent, four-tiered specialized legal mechanism of administrative justice, which includes the interrelated factors of court organization, the judiciary and their legal status. The range of the four specialized tiers of the administrative judicial system is proposed. It is argued that they should include a systematic succession represented by lower courts, first instance lower courts, area courts and a Higher Administrative Court of the Russian Federation.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>BRICS countries</kwd><kwd>administrative law</kwd><kwd>administrative justice</kwd><kwd>specialized administrative judiciary</kwd><kwd>court specialization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Euro-American Model Code of Administrative Jurisdiction: English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish Versions (г. Perlingeiro &amp; K.-P Sommermann (eds.), Niterói: Editora da UFF, 2014).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Euro-American Model Code of Administrative Jurisdiction: English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish Versions (г. Perlingeiro &amp; K.-P Sommermann (eds.), Niterói: Editora da UFF, 2014).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fa J.-P &amp; Leng S. Judicial Review of Administration in the People's Republic of China, 23(3) Case Western Reserve Journal Of International Law 447 (1991).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fa J.-P &amp; Leng S. Judicial Review of Administration in the People's Republic of China, 23(3) Case Western Reserve Journal Of International Law 447 (1991).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">La justicia administrative en el derecho comparado (J. Barnes Vazquez (ed.), Madrid: Civitas, 1993).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">La justicia administrative en el derecho comparado (J. Barnes Vazquez (ed.), Madrid: Civitas, 1993).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maleshin D. Overview of Russian Civil Justice, 3(4) BRICS Law Journal 41 (2016).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maleshin D. Overview of Russian Civil Justice, 3(4) BRICS Law Journal 41 (2016).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Naitao W. The Origin of the Chinese Legal System, 33 Beijing Review 23 (1990).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Naitao W. The Origin of the Chinese Legal System, 33 Beijing Review 23 (1990).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Perlingeiro R. Contemporary Challenges in Latin American Administrative Justice, 3(2) BRICS Law Journal 21 (2016).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Perlingeiro R. Contemporary Challenges in Latin American Administrative Justice, 3(2) BRICS Law Journal 21 (2016).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Silvestri E. Judicial Specialization: In Search of the "Right" Judge for Each Case?, 2(4) Russian Law Journal 169 (2014).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Silvestri E. Judicial Specialization: In Search of the "Right" Judge for Each Case?, 2(4) Russian Law Journal 169 (2014).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Uzelac A. Mixed Blessing of Judicial Specialization: The Devil Is in the Detail, 2(4) Russian Law Journal 146 (2014).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Uzelac A. Mixed Blessing of Judicial Specialization: The Devil Is in the Detail, 2(4) Russian Law Journal 146 (2014).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Voet s. Belgium's New Specialized Judiciary, 2(4) Russian Law Journal 129 (2014).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Voet s. Belgium's New Specialized Judiciary, 2(4) Russian Law Journal 129 (2014).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wasek-Wiaderek M. The Principle of "Equality of arms" in Criminal Procedure Under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Its Functions in Criminal Justice of Selected European Countries (Leuven: Leuven university Press, 2000).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wasek-Wiaderek M. The Principle of "Equality of arms" in Criminal Procedure Under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Its Functions in Criminal Justice of Selected European Countries (Leuven: Leuven university Press, 2000).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
