bricslawjournalBRICS Law JournalЮридический журнал БРИКС2409-90582412-2343Publishing House V.Ема10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-2-154-178bricslawjournal-1047Research ArticleCOMMENTSRussian Public Assembly Law: Constitutional Evolution 1993–2023SalenkoA.

Alexander Salenko – Associate Professor, Higher School of Law, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University; Member, Qualification Board of Judges of the Kaliningrad Region.

14 A. Nevskogo St., Kaliningrad, 236016

ASalenko@kantiana.ruImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityRussian Federation202429072024112154178Copyright © Salenko A., 20242024Salenko A.Salenko A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/1047

The current Public Assembly Law in the Russian Federation, which regulates the implementation of the constitutional right to freedom of peaceful assembly in Russia, has been developed and formed over the course of the past three decades, following the ratification of the Russian Constitution in 1993. The Public Assembly Law can be described as an important institute of public law as well as a sub-branch of the constitutional law of Russia, which combines constitutional provisions, relevant norms of the federal and regional laws and case law of the Russian Constitutional Court regarding the implementation of the Freedom of Peaceful Assembly. The modern Public Assembly Law has high importance for the development of a democratic society and for the rule of law. The author investigates the constitutional adjudication of the Russian Constitutional Court from 1993–2023, focusing in particular on its eleven judgments concerning the implementation of Article 31 of the Russian Constitution, which defines the constitutional standards of the Freedom of Peaceful Assembly. The author also examines several prominent cases of the Russian Constitutional Court, referred to as decisions with positive content, which are crucial for obtaining a systemic overview of the current problems of the Public Assembly Law in the Russian Federation.

freedom of peaceful assemblypublic assembly lawdemonstrationsralliespicketingmeetingscase lawrestrictionsRussian ConstitutionConstitutional Court of Russia (CCR)This article was prepared in the framework of the research project “Constitutional Legitimation of Public Authority in Modern Russia” (No. 20-011-31740) funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) and the Expert Institute for Social Research (EISR).ReferencesАлексеев С.С. Восхождение к праву. Поиски и решения [Alekseev S.S. Ascension to Law: Searches and Solutions] (2001).Алексеев С.С. Восхождение к праву. Поиски и решения [Alekseev S.S. Ascension to Law: Searches and Solutions] (2001).Грищенко Т.А., Ляшенко Т.Т. Реализация права на одиночный пикет в условиях ужесточения законодательства (проблемы практики) // Современное общество и право. 2022. № 4(59). С. 41–48 [Grishchenko T.A. & Lyashenko T.T. Realization of the Right to a Single Picket in the Term of Stricter Legislation (Problems of Practice), 4(59) Modern Society and Law 41 (2022)].Грищенко Т.А., Ляшенко Т.Т. Реализация права на одиночный пикет в условиях ужесточения законодательства (проблемы практики) // Современное общество и право. 2022. № 4(59). С. 41–48 [Grishchenko T.A. & Lyashenko T.T. Realization of the Right to a Single Picket in the Term of Stricter Legislation (Problems of Practice), 4(59) Modern Society and Law 41 (2022)].Конституционный Суд России: осмысление опыта / Медушевский А.Н., Гриценко Е.В., Кененова И.П. [и др.] [Medushevsky A.N. et al. Constitutional Court of Russia: Understanding the Experience] (2022).Конституционный Суд России: осмысление опыта / Медушевский А.Н., Гриценко Е.В., Кененова И.П. [и др.] [Medushevsky A.N. et al. Constitutional Court of Russia: Understanding the Experience] (2022).Нуссбергер А. Европа, твои права человека // Международное правосудие. 2020. № 3(35). С. 3–19 [Nußberger A. Europe, Your Human Rights, 3(35) International Justice 3 (2020)].Нуссбергер А. Европа, твои права человека // Международное правосудие. 2020. № 3(35). С. 3–19 [Nußberger A. Europe, Your Human Rights, 3(35) International Justice 3 (2020)].Саленко А.В. Одиночный пикет в России и Германии: конституционно-правовое измерение // Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Социально-экономические и правовые исследования. 2022. Т. 8. № 4(32). С. 131–144 [Salenko A.V. Single Picket in Russia and Germany: Constitutional and Legal Dimension, 8, 4(32) Bulletin of Tyumen State University, Socio-Economic and Legal Research 131 (2022)].Саленко А.В. Одиночный пикет в России и Германии: конституционно-правовое измерение // Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Социально-экономические и правовые исследования. 2022. Т. 8. № 4(32). С. 131–144 [Salenko A.V. Single Picket in Russia and Germany: Constitutional and Legal Dimension, 8, 4(32) Bulletin of Tyumen State University, Socio-Economic and Legal Research 131 (2022)].

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.