<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">bricslawjournal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">BRICS Law Journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Юридический журнал БРИКС</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2409-9058</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2412-2343</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Publishing House V.Ема</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-2-91-112</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">bricslawjournal-1044</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARTICLE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The Changes of the Basic Rights in the Current Constitution of China</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Weiming</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Wang Weiming – Associate Professor, School of Law, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law.</p><p>7989 Waiqingsong Rd., Qingpu District, Shanghai, 201701</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">wwm33@126.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Symaniuk</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Nina Symaniuk – Associate Professor, Department of Theory, Methodology and Legal Support of Public and Municipal Administration, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University.</p><p>19 Mira St., Yekaterinburg, 620002</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">n.v.symaniuk@urfu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>Shanghai University of Political Science and Law</institution><country>China</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-2"><institution>Ural Federal University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>07</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>112</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Weiming W., Symaniuk N., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Weiming W., Symaniuk N.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Weiming W., Symaniuk N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/1044">https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/1044</self-uri><abstract><p>The current Constitution of the People’s Republic of China is the 1982 Constitution, which is the fourth constitution after the founding of the People’s Republic of China. The provisions of the current Constitution on the fundamental rights of citizens are generally similar to those of the first Constitution of 1954, but are more specific, while the freedom of movement provided for in the 1954 Constitution is deleted. The 1975 Constitution and the 1978 Constitution are the second and third Constitutions, respectively. Because of their special historical period, the provisions on fundamental rights in these two constitutions are retrogressive and failing. The historical background of the revision of the Constitution, the possibility of realizing rights and the level of social development are the main reasons for determining the provisions of the basic rights of citizens in the 1982 Constitution. In 2004, the current Constitution was amended to include “the State respects and protects human rights,” which establishes the constitutional obligation of the State to guarantee human rights. In practice, there is still ongoing debate over how the State’s guarantee obligations are implemented and whether citizens can file lawsuits if they believe that their fundamental rights have been violated. In recent years, the recordation review has partially realized the supervision of legislation that may infringe on citizens’ basic rights by reviewing the constitutionality and legality of laws and regulations, but citizens have not been able to directly protect their rights through litigation. The changes in the basic rights of citizens in terms of constitutional provisions and legal guarantees over the past 40 years are the result of the development of the rule of law in China. In order to more effectively solve the problem of constitutional rights from text to reality, it is also necessary to further develop the constitutional review system.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>current Constitution of China</kwd><kwd>1954 Constitution</kwd><kwd>fundamental rights</kwd><kwd>Recordation Review</kwd><kwd>constitutional review</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dayuan H. The Process of Formulating the Constitution in 1954 (2014).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dayuan H. The Process of Formulating the Constitution in 1954 (2014).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fan Z. On the Construction Ideas and Value Basis of the Principle of the Lower Limit of the State of Emergency – Taking Our Country as the Object of Analysis, 1 Politics and Law (2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fan Z. On the Construction Ideas and Value Basis of the Principle of the Lower Limit of the State of Emergency – Taking Our Country as the Object of Analysis, 1 Politics and Law (2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hong Z. The Limitation and Boundary of Individual Rights under Epidemic Prevention and Control, 2 Comparative Law Research (2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hong Z. The Limitation and Boundary of Individual Rights under Epidemic Prevention and Control, 2 Comparative Law Research (2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huizong L. The Essentials of the Constitution (2nd ed. 2004).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huizong L. The Essentials of the Constitution (2nd ed. 2004).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Political Group of the Research Office of the General Office of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (ed.). A Refined Interpretation of the Chinese Constitution (1996).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Political Group of the Research Office of the General Office of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (ed.). A Refined Interpretation of the Chinese Constitution (1996).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Recordation Review Office of the Legal Affairs Committee of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (ed.). Recordation Review of Normative Documents (2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Recordation Review Office of the Legal Affairs Committee of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (ed.). Recordation Review of Normative Documents (2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weiming W. Comparative Study on the Constitutional Review System in Eastern European Countries (2008).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weiming W. Comparative Study on the Constitutional Review System in Eastern European Countries (2008).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weiyun X. The Birth of Our Country’s Current Constitution (1986).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weiyun X. The Birth of Our Country’s Current Constitution (1986).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhicheng L. The Path of Interpretation of the Scope of Protection of Communication Secrets: Original Purpose Position and Comparative Investigation, 22(2) Peking University Law Review (2023).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhicheng L. The Path of Interpretation of the Scope of Protection of Communication Secrets: Original Purpose Position and Comparative Investigation, 22(2) Peking University Law Review (2023).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhiwei T. Outline of the Unified Relationship Between Civil Rights and State Power Opposition, 6 China Law (1995).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhiwei T. Outline of the Unified Relationship Between Civil Rights and State Power Opposition, 6 China Law (1995).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
