<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">bricslawjournal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">BRICS Law Journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Юридический журнал БРИКС</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2409-9058</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2412-2343</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Publishing House V.Ема</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-2-95-134</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">bricslawjournal-100</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARTICLE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>THE SUI GENERIS OF NUCLEAR FATWA UNDER CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LA</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Seyvanizad</surname><given-names>Jaber</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Research Assistant and Lecturer</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">sayvania@ymail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>Public International Law, Islamic Azad University</institution><country>Islamic Republic of Iran</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>07</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>95</fpage><lpage>134</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Seyvanizad J., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Seyvanizad J.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Seyvanizad J.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/100">https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/100</self-uri><abstract><p>Due to the fluctuating nature of the Customary International Law, emerging customs have had good potential to appear in several forms during the past decade. In other words, there are various legal mechanisms indicating the genesis of CIL. One of these forms is the internationally known unilateral act of State which can be potentially recognized as a customary rule. The best example of a unilateral act of State would be Truman Proclamation which was transformed into a customary international rule concerning law of seas. With regards to the same legal framework and acts like Truman Proclamation, this research tries to answer the question that how the sui generis of fatwa in a custom-construction process concerning international law of WMD and through the modernized methodology can contribute. Illustrating the superiority of fatwa over the sui generis treaties on one hand and restricting mechanisms like NPT on the other, it can be indicated that the first steps concerning the genesis of a new customary approach in the field of international law of WMD has been derived from nuclear fatwa.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>nuclear fatwa</kwd><kwd>customary international law</kwd><kwd>law of treaties</kwd><kwd>NPT</kwd><kwd>WMD</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bernhardt R. Custom and Treaty in the Law of the Sea, 205 Recueil des Cours: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (1987).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bernhardt R. Custom and Treaty in the Law of the Sea, 205 Recueil des Cours: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (1987).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brownlie I. Principles of Public International Law (7th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brownlie I. Principles of Public International Law (7th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Byers M. Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Byers M. Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cheng B. Custom: The Future of General State Practice in a Divided World in The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy Doctrine and Theory (R. McDonald &amp; D.M. Johnston (eds.), Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1986).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cheng B. Custom: The Future of General State Practice in a Divided World in The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy Doctrine and Theory (R. McDonald &amp; D.M. Johnston (eds.), Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1986).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Danilenko G.M. The Theory of International Customary Law, 31 German Yearbook of International Law (1988).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Danilenko G.M. The Theory of International Customary Law, 31 German Yearbook of International Law (1988).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">D’Amato A.A. The Concept of Custom in International Law (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">D’Amato A.A. The Concept of Custom in International Law (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2002 (S.J. Cummins &amp; D.P. Stewart (eds.), Washington, DC: International Law Institute, 2003).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Digest of United States Practice in International Law 2002 (S.J. Cummins &amp; D.P. Stewart (eds.), Washington, DC: International Law Institute, 2003).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dinstein Y. The Interaction Between Customary International Law and Treaties, 322 Recueil des Cours: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (2006).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dinstein Y. The Interaction Between Customary International Law and Treaties, 322 Recueil des Cours: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (2006).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gross L. Essays on International Law and Organization, Volume I/II (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1984).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gross L. Essays on International Law and Organization, Volume I/II (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1984).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Haggenmacher P. La doctrine des deux éléments du droit coutumier dans la pratique de la Cour internationale, 90 Revue générale de droit international public (1986).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Haggenmacher P. La doctrine des deux éléments du droit coutumier dans la pratique de la Cour internationale, 90 Revue générale de droit international public (1986).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Henckaerts J.-M. &amp; Doswald-Beck L. Customary International Humanitarian Law (New York: ICRC &amp; Cambridge University Press, 2005).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Henckaerts J.-M. &amp; Doswald-Beck L. Customary International Humanitarian Law (New York: ICRC &amp; Cambridge University Press, 2005).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mendelson M.H. The Formation of Customary International Law, 272 Recueil des Cours: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (1998).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mendelson M.H. The Formation of Customary International Law, 272 Recueil des Cours: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (1998).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mullerson R. The Interplay of Objective and Subjective Elements in Customary Law in International Law: Theory and Practice: Essays in Honour of Eric Suy (K. Wellens (ed.), The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mullerson R. The Interplay of Objective and Subjective Elements in Customary Law in International Law: Theory and Practice: Essays in Honour of Eric Suy (K. Wellens (ed.), The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Seyvanizad J. Nuclear Fatwa under International Law (Los Angeles, CA: Supreme Century, 2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Seyvanizad J. Nuclear Fatwa under International Law (Los Angeles, CA: Supreme Century, 2017).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tunkin G. International Politics and the Creation of Norms of International Law, 219 Recueil des Cours: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (1989).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tunkin G. International Politics and the Creation of Norms of International Law, 219 Recueil des Cours: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (1989).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
