PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN BRAZIL
https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2015-2-1-51-55
Abstract
About the Author
R. PerlingeiroBrazil
Ricardo Perlingeiro (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) – Full Professor at Law School, Fluminense Federal university, Federal Appellate Judge of the Regional Federal Court of the 2nd Region (Rio de Janeiro) and Chairman of the Executive Committee of the National Council of Justice for the Monitoring and Settlement of Health Care Assistance Claims in the State of Rio de Janeiro
(84 Rua Professor Hernani Melo, São Domingos, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, 24210-130, Brasil)
References
1. Alexy, Robert. Teoria dos direitos fundamentais 470, 472, 512–13 (Virgílio A. da Silva, trans.) (Malheiros 2008).
2. Cane, Peter. Administrative Law 4–9 (5th ed., Oxford university Press 2011).
3. Clarich, Marcello. XIV. L’esecuzione, Diritto processuale amministrativo (= 7 Corso di diritto amministrativo diretto da Sabino Cassese) 297, 302–03 (Aldo Sandulli, ed.) (2nd ed., giuffrè 2013).
4. General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Art. 12), u.N. ESCOR, Comm. on Econ., Soc. & Cult. Rts., 22nd Sess., u.N. Doc. E/C.12/2000/4 (2000), at <http://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838d0.html> (accessed Aug. 5, 2015).
5. Häberle, Peter. Grundrechte im Leistungsstaat, in Wolfgang Martens et al., grundrechte im Leistungsstaat. Die Dogmatik des Verwaltungsrechts vor den gegenwartsaufgaben der Verwaltung. Berichte und Diskussionen auf der Tagung der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer in Regensburg vom 29. September bis 2. Oktober 1971 (= 30 Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer (VVDStRL)) 43, 49 ff. (De gruyter 1972), available at <http://www.degruyter.com/viewbooktoc/product/56448> (accessed Aug. 5, 2015).
6. Hesse, Konrad. Bestand und Bedeutung der Grundrechte in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 5 Europäische grundrechte-Zeitschrift (EugRZ) 427 (1978).
7. L’exécution des décisions des jurisdictions administratives: VIIIème congrès de l’Association internationale des hautes juridictions administratives (Madrid, 2004), <http://www.aihja.org/images/users/1/files/2004_Congres_de_Madrid_Rapport_VIII_congres_VIII_vf.pdf?PHPSESSID=f83dg63dqj61vokoep4kk44fu1> (accessed Aug. 5, 2015).
8. Mari, giuseppina. Il giudizio di ottemperanza, in 2 Il nuovo processo amministrativo 457 (Maria A. Sandulli, ed.) (giuffrè 2013).
9. Maurer, Hartmut. Derecho administrativo alemán (= 637 Doctrina Jurídica) 50–54, 57–58, 114–28, 406, 479 (universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 2012).
10. Ojeda, Alberto R. La ejecucion de creditos pecuniarios contra entes publicos 21 (Civitas 1993).
11. Pellegrini grinover, Ada. O controle jurisdicional de políticas públicas, in O controle jurisdicional de políticas públicas 138 (Ada Pellegrini grinover & Kazuo Watanabe, eds.) (2nd ed., Forense 2013).
12. Perlingeiro, Ricardo. A tutela judicial do direito público à saúde no Brasil, 2012(41) Direito, Estado e Sociedade, available at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2250121> (accessed Aug. 5, 2015).
13. Perlingeiro, Ricardo. È a reserva do possível um limite à intervenção jurisdicional nas políticas públicas sociais? / Does the Vorbehalt des Möglichen (the Proviso of the Possible) Limit Judicial Intervention in Social Public Policies?, 1(2) Revista de Direito Administrativo Contemporâneo (ReDAC) 182–83 (2013), available at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2343965> (accessed Aug. 5, 2015).
14. Perlingeiro, Ricardo. O princípio da isonomia na tutela judicial individual e coletiva, e em outros meios de solução de conflitos, junto ao SUS e aos planos privados de saúde, 5(10) R. Proc.-geral Mun. Belo Horizonte (RPgMBH) (2012), available at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2241142> (accessed Aug. 5, 2015).
15. Perlingeiro, Ricardo. Os cuidados de saúde dos idosos entre as limitações orçamentárias e o direito a um mínimo existencial / Health Care for the Elderly: Between the Budget Constraints and the Right to an Existential Minimum, 15(1) R. Dir. sanit. (2014), available at <http://www.revistas.usp.br/rdisan/article/view/82808/85763> (accessed Aug. 5, 2015). doi:10.11606/issn.2316-9044.v15i1p83-118
16. Rivero, Jean, & Waline, Jean. Droit administratif 1–5 (21st ed., Dalloz 2006).
17. Sommermann, Karl-Peter. Soziale Rechte in Stufen: Überwindung einer alten Debatte?, in Rechtsstaatlichkeit, Freiheit und soziale Rechte in der Europäischen union: Deidesheimer Kolloquium 2012 zu Ehren von Detlef Merten anlässlich seines 75. geburtstages (= 80 Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen und Reden zur Philosophie, Politik und geistesgeschichte) 107 (Christian Calliess et al., eds.) (Duncker & Humblot 2014).
18. The Right to Health: Fact Sheet No. 31, at 5 (Office of the united Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR); World Health Organization (WHO) 2008), available at <http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/Factsheet31.pdf> (accessed Aug. 5, 2015).
19. Wolff, Hans J., et al. 1 Direito administrativo 255, 263–86, 490 (António F. de Sousa, trans.) (Fundação Calouste gulbenkian 2006).
20. Ziller, Jacques. Modelli di responsabilità dell’amministrazione in alcuni ordinamenti europei, 2009(2) Dir. e soc.
Review
For citations:
Perlingeiro R. PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN BRAZIL. BRICS Law Journal. 2015;2(1):15-32. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2015-2-1-51-55